* Kate Bronstad * September 21 st , 2007 * Engaging the academic  science community through  technology
Overview The case for technology Scientists and Web  2.0 Examples and Ideas  Collaboration Conclusion
The Case for Technology Adapt to changes in science along with the scientists Meet scientists along their workflow Encourage trust and reputation Alleviate information overload
Scientists and Web 2.0 Web 2.0   Scientist participation Web 2.0 + Science examples   Wikis:  WikiSpecies ,  WikiProteins Aggregators:  Scintilla ,  Postgenomic   Pre-prints:  ArXiv ,  Nature Proceedings Tags:  Connotea Networking:  Knowble ,  Facebook
Engage Scientists Online Science library site : Tag cloud IM reference widget Wiki    RSS feed New books Faculty recommendations
Engage Scientists Online Library catalog Fewer search interfaces New ways of searching ( PennTags ) Links to postgenomic, del.icio.us
Engage Scientists Online Tools for other university websites CTools: canned searches, customizable widgets Annotations Data visualization/manipulation tools Wiki framework Support citation and ( Web Cite ,  Nature Proceedings ) and prominence for blogs
Engage Scientists Online Bring library information to the user External websites : Google, Facebook, CTools widgets Tools similar to LibX firefox extension; pull-down list of tools ( Tlbox ) Second Life presence
Engage Scientists in the Library Area where faculty/student work is displayed, downloaded. Support for mobile devices ( InfoGallery ) More than books: learning lab, equipment Text reference/send librarian to patron’s location.
Librarian - Scientist Collaboration Advice for preservation and findability Solicit information regarding what is needed Awards and visibility for developing tools
Best Practiced Technology Collaborative Flexible Up-to-date

Tech Sci

  • 1.
    * Kate Bronstad* September 21 st , 2007 * Engaging the academic science community through technology
  • 2.
    Overview The casefor technology Scientists and Web 2.0 Examples and Ideas Collaboration Conclusion
  • 3.
    The Case forTechnology Adapt to changes in science along with the scientists Meet scientists along their workflow Encourage trust and reputation Alleviate information overload
  • 4.
    Scientists and Web2.0 Web 2.0 Scientist participation Web 2.0 + Science examples Wikis: WikiSpecies , WikiProteins Aggregators: Scintilla , Postgenomic Pre-prints: ArXiv , Nature Proceedings Tags: Connotea Networking: Knowble , Facebook
  • 5.
    Engage Scientists OnlineScience library site : Tag cloud IM reference widget Wiki RSS feed New books Faculty recommendations
  • 6.
    Engage Scientists OnlineLibrary catalog Fewer search interfaces New ways of searching ( PennTags ) Links to postgenomic, del.icio.us
  • 7.
    Engage Scientists OnlineTools for other university websites CTools: canned searches, customizable widgets Annotations Data visualization/manipulation tools Wiki framework Support citation and ( Web Cite , Nature Proceedings ) and prominence for blogs
  • 8.
    Engage Scientists OnlineBring library information to the user External websites : Google, Facebook, CTools widgets Tools similar to LibX firefox extension; pull-down list of tools ( Tlbox ) Second Life presence
  • 9.
    Engage Scientists inthe Library Area where faculty/student work is displayed, downloaded. Support for mobile devices ( InfoGallery ) More than books: learning lab, equipment Text reference/send librarian to patron’s location.
  • 10.
    Librarian - ScientistCollaboration Advice for preservation and findability Solicit information regarding what is needed Awards and visibility for developing tools
  • 11.
    Best Practiced TechnologyCollaborative Flexible Up-to-date