International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 07 Issue: 04 | Apr 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2020, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.34 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1308
Co-axial fed Tri-Slot Antenna for Triple-band application
Amarnath K Netke1, V. V. Yerigeri2
1,2Department of Post Graduation, MBES COE Ambajogai (MS), India
1,2Dr. B. A. T. U. Lonere, India
2Professor & Head of Department, MBES COE, Ambajogai (MS), India
---------------------------------------------------------------------***----------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - We simulated and presented two band co-axial
fed microstrip patch antenna for wireless communication
application. In proposed design, it has been found that theslot
dimension of patch and feed position of patch have clear
impact on good performance of antenna. We introducedthree
rectangular slot on patch to achieve desired narrow band of
proposed antenna. Wedemonstratedmanyantennastructures
to study of these parameters on the resulting dual-band
response. In this paper, we designed tri-band microstrip
rectangle antenna with slot antenna using co-axial-fed
technique, it support the three wireless communication bands
that is (2.28-2.35 GHz) , (4.05-4.11 GHz) and (5.8-5.9) GHz.
Key Words: (Tripleband Microstrip antenna, bandwidth
enhancement, Co-axial feed technique)
1. INTRODUCTION
Rapid development of wireless communication and
microstrip antenna it has been found that, analysis of
Microstrip antenna with co-axial and line-feed technique,
microstrip patch Antenna experimentally optimize antenna
parameters and decreases the Return Loss up to -35dB for
the frequency range to operate for Bluetooth antenna in
frequency range 2.4 GHz to 2.5GHz andVSWR islessthan1.5
by using RT DUROID 5880[1]. In further study of
optimization of dual band microstrip antenna [2] ithasbeen
found that the return loss for dual bandFrequencyat2.4GHz
is -43dB and at 3GHz is -27dB and acceptable VSWR. To get
compact size and maintain performance of antenna for
multiple band that is dual band, triple band antenna etc.,
various shapes of antenna was integrated [3]. It was
presented in [4], introducing slot into patch that is L-Shape,
experimentally increase bandwidth up to 13%. To enhance
bandwidth further various shapes like L-shape,U-shapeetc.,
slot was introduced andbandwidth upto42%wasincreased
[5,6]. In [7] and [8] the author’s proposed bandwidth
enhancement techniques that is by using photonic band gap
structure and wideband stacked microstrip antennas
respectively. By introducing stacked microstrip antenna
band width and gain was enhanced. While Designing of
symmetrical microstrip antenna, it has been found that
microstripantenna hasnarrowBandwidth [9],Asymmetrical
position of patch antenna on ground affect the performance
of antenna that is to enhance bandwidth it was also found
that asymmetrical position of slot on patch affects
performance of antenna[10] thatis asymmetrical L-shape,U-
shape position of slot on patch affects the performance. In
[10] designed asymmetrical slot of L-shaped on patch
antenna for UWB application with acceptable return loss
that is -10dB and peak gain 2.2 to 6.1 dBi for operating
bandwidth 3.01-11.30 GHz frequencies. In this paper we
simulated and presented our design by using HFSS.13
simulator. In this paper a line feedpatchwiththreerectangle
slot microstrip antenna with two antisymmetrical notch
(Figure 1) is designed and simulated for thefrequencyrange
of 1-6 GHz. This antenna presents an extension to
Miniaturization of Differentially-Driven Microstrip Planar
Inverted F Antenna [14].
2. PROPOSED DESIGN
The results of proposed dual band microstrip patch antenna
verified in HFSS Simulator with optimization. Initially,
microstrip antenna was designed for single band further it is
designed and optimized for dual band, simulation setup is
shown in Figure 1. Actual patch shape of size 25mm X 25mm
is shown in figure 2, it consists of two rectangular notch of
size 0.2mmx12.5mm, using this two slot on patch side of
antenna we designed single band antenna with acceptable
performance parameter. We further introduced central
rectangular notch of size 13.4x1.0mm to optimize and
operate antenna for dual band. [7]. The resulting antenna
structure has the following parameters; the patch shape
length Wp = 12.5 mm, and its width Lp =12.5 mm. The size of
the ground plane has been found to be of Lg1 = 12.5 mm and
Wg1 = 12.5mm. The height of substrate is h= 0.8 mm and
dielectric constant εr = 4.4. A co-axial fed at 10x10mm
distance from corner of patch. The length andwidthofcenter
slot is 1.0mm x 13.4mm.
Initially, we will conduct a simulation study on the structure
of Figure 1 by adjusting the dimension of slot that is position
of fed line to patch. Initially we put ground position forentire
patch. As we reduce ground material, it is found that return
loss is getting reduced from -10dB to -18dB. The ground
substrate length on backside of patch is reduced and
simulated for different dimension; it is observed that we get
two band (2.28-2.35GHz)and(4.05-4.11GHz)withsufficient
return loss, the resulting return loss responses obtained by
reducing ground plane, we obtain optimized return loss as
presented in figure 3. Further we simulated togetthirdband,
we introduced two rectangular slot (Ls as shown in figure 3)
on patch, we simulated fordifferentdimensionofrectangular
slot on patch to get optimum result,dimensionofrectangular
changes from 0.8x12.5mm to 1.2x12.5mm and return loss is
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 07 Issue: 04 | Apr 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2020, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.34 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1309
presented in figure 3. Further we changed the dimension of
central slot from 0.1x13.4 mm to 0.8x13.4 mm (Ls in figure
4), return loss is presented in figure 4.
Figure 1. Proposed antenna simulation setup
Figure 2: Proposed antenna design (Ground)
3. RESULT ANALYSIS
In this section parametric study is conductedtooptimizethe
proposed antenna. The key design parameters used for the
optimization are number of slot on patch, dimension of
ground plane (length and width) and fed position. The
detailed analysis of these parameters is investigated in the
following paragraphs of this section. From figure 3 and
figure 4, it is observed that, we get minimum return lossthat
is -25dB, and -22 dB at 2.3GHz and 4.07GHz respectively.
We enhanced this designed dual mocrostri antenna for
multiband application that is we analyzed for third band, by
adjusting position of fed line, feed line position by 0.1 mm
from 9.5x10.5 to 10x10.5mm performance is presented in
figure 5.It is observed that antenna is good candidate to
operate for tri band frequency response.
Fig 3: Return loss of antenna for variation in slot
Results of the variation of the size of the ground plane, as
Figure 3 implies that the dual band response increases for
slot dimension reduction by introducing slot into it.
However, dual-band responses are obtained with increased
or decreased higher resonating bands. The effect of the
width of ground has been demonstrated in Figure 3, and
Figure 4. Also figure 5 implies that there is clear impact of
feed line position on multiband response of antenna.
Fig 4: Return loss of antenna for variation in ground plane
For larger values of the width of ground, the antenna offers a
one-band resonant behavior, and the dual-band resonance
occurs as the width is made smaller and approaches that of
the reference antenna.
Fig 5: Return loss of antenna for variation fed position
Fig 6: E-Field and H-Field Radiation pattern at 2.3GHz
(Red: θ=0o, Blue: Φ=90o)
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 07 Issue: 04 | Apr 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2020, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.34 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1310
Fig. 7 E-Field and H-Field Radiation pattern at 4.05GHz
(Red: θ=0o, Blue: Φ=90o)
Fig. 8 E-Field and H-Field Radiation pattern at 5.85 GHz
(Red: θ=0o, Blue: Φ=90o)
Fig. 9 VSWR
Figure (6)-(8) depicts the radiation pattern for tri band that
is at 2.3GHz, 4.07GHz and 5.85GHz frequency since return
loss at this frequency is -25dB, -24dB and -27dB
respectively. Figure(9) represents VSWR for all band,VSWR
is less than 2 for all band that is good matchingbetweenfeed
line patch. Table 1 presents optimized result of microstrip
antnna.
Table 1. Simulation Result
Frequency
Return
loss
VSWR Efficiency
2.28-2.35
GHz
-25 0.9 95%
4.05-4.11
GHz
-24 1.1 94%
5.8-5.9GHz -27 1.2 95%
4. CONCLUSION
The design optimization of a two slot patch antenna has
been presented and discussed. It has been shown that, with
correct selection of slot dimensions on patch and shape of
ground plane, a dual band frequency response can be
achieved. With this antenna, we get much improved
performance this design is obtained method, as a candidate
for use dual band that is (2.28-2.35 GHz) , (4.05-4.11 GHz)
and (5.8-5.9) GHz. The antenna has been modeled and its
performance has been analyzed using a HFSS simulator. The
proposed antenna has been found to possess a miniaturized
size and a width making it suitable for compact size narrow
bandwidth tri band applications.
REFERENCES
[1] Ahmed H. Reja “Study of Micro Strip Feed Line
PatchAntenna”, Antennas and Propagation International
Symposium, vol. 27, pp. 340-342 December 2008..
[2] Sahntanu Kumar Behera and Y. Choukiker, ”Design
andOptimization of Dual Band Micro Strip Antenna Using
Practicle Swarm Optimization Technique,” Springer Science
Business Media, LLC, pp. 1346-1354, 2010
[3] M. A. S. Alkanhal, ”Compact composite triple band
antenna”, Progress In Electromagnetics Research, PIER 93,
221-236, 2009
[4] A. A. Deshmukh and G. Kumar, “Compact broadband
gapcoupled shorted L-shaped microstrip antennas,” IEEE
Antennas and Propagation International Symposium, vol 1,
(Baltimore, Maryland), pp. 106–109, IEEE, July 2001.
[5] Z. M.Chen and Y. W. M. Chial, “Broadband probe-fed
Lshaped plate antenna,” Microwave and Optical Technology
Letters, vol. 26, pp. 204–206, 1985.
[6] K. F. Lee, K. M. Luk, K. F. Tong, Y. L. Yung, and T.Huynh,
“Experimental study of the rectangular patch with a U-
shaped slot,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation International
Symposium, vol.1, (Baltimore, Maryland), pp. 10–13, IEEE,
July 1996.
[7] S. C. Gao, L. W. Li, M. S. Leong, and T. S. Yeo, “Designand
analysis of a novel wideband microstrip antenna,” IEEE
Antennas and Propagation International Symposium,vol.1,
(Boston, Massachusetts), pp. 90–93, IEEE, July 2001.
[8] M. Khodier and C. Christodoulou, “A technique to
furtherincrease the bandwidth Of stacked microstrip
antennas,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation International
Symposium, vol. 3, pp. 1394–1397, IEEE, July 2000.
[9] Neenansha Jain, Anubhuti Khare, Rajesh Nema, “E-
ShapeMicro strip Patch Antenna on Different Thickness for
pervasive WirelessCommunication”,International Journal of
Advanced Computer Science and Applications, Vol. 2, No. 4,
2011
[10] K. Song, Y.-Z. Yin, S.-T. Fan, and B. Chen,” compact open
ended L-shaped slot antenna with asymmetrical rectangle
patch for UWB application”, Progress In Electromagnetics
Research C, Vol. 19, 235-243, 2011
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 07 Issue: 04 | Apr 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2020, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.34 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1311
[11]V.V.Reddy, N. V. S. N. Sarma, “Triband Circularly
Polarized Koch Fractal Boundary Microstrip Antenna”, IEEE
antennas and wireless propagation letters, vol. 13, 2014
[12] T.-H. Chang and J.-F. Kiang, “Compact multi-band H-
shaped slot antenna,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 61,
no. 8, pp. 4345–4349,
[13] K. Song, Y.-Z. Yin, S.-T. Fan, and B. Chen, “compact open-
ended l-shaped slot antenna with asymmetrical rectangular
patch for UWB applications”, Progress In Electromagnetics
Research C, Vol. 19, 235-243, 2011
[14] Zijian Shao, Yue Ping Zhang, “Miniaturization of
Differentially-Driven Microstrip PlanarInvertedFAntenna”,
IEEE Transactions On Antennas And Propagation, 0018-
926X (c) 2018.
AUTHOR’S PROFILE
Amarnath Kashinath Netke, has
completed his Bachelor’s Degree from
Electronics and Telecommunication
Department & pursuing Masters in
Digital Communication Department in
MBES college of Engineering,
Ambajogai, India
Prof. V. V. Yerigeri, has completed B.E
in Electronics & Communication
Engineering & M.E. in Power Electronics
& Perusing Ph.D in Signal Processing.He
has teaching experience of more than24
Years. He has presented many papers in
National & International Conferences &
Published more than 50 papers in National & International
Journals.

IRJET - Co-Axial Fed Tri-Slot Antenna for Triple-Band Application

  • 1.
    International Research Journalof Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 07 Issue: 04 | Apr 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2020, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.34 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1308 Co-axial fed Tri-Slot Antenna for Triple-band application Amarnath K Netke1, V. V. Yerigeri2 1,2Department of Post Graduation, MBES COE Ambajogai (MS), India 1,2Dr. B. A. T. U. Lonere, India 2Professor & Head of Department, MBES COE, Ambajogai (MS), India ---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - We simulated and presented two band co-axial fed microstrip patch antenna for wireless communication application. In proposed design, it has been found that theslot dimension of patch and feed position of patch have clear impact on good performance of antenna. We introducedthree rectangular slot on patch to achieve desired narrow band of proposed antenna. Wedemonstratedmanyantennastructures to study of these parameters on the resulting dual-band response. In this paper, we designed tri-band microstrip rectangle antenna with slot antenna using co-axial-fed technique, it support the three wireless communication bands that is (2.28-2.35 GHz) , (4.05-4.11 GHz) and (5.8-5.9) GHz. Key Words: (Tripleband Microstrip antenna, bandwidth enhancement, Co-axial feed technique) 1. INTRODUCTION Rapid development of wireless communication and microstrip antenna it has been found that, analysis of Microstrip antenna with co-axial and line-feed technique, microstrip patch Antenna experimentally optimize antenna parameters and decreases the Return Loss up to -35dB for the frequency range to operate for Bluetooth antenna in frequency range 2.4 GHz to 2.5GHz andVSWR islessthan1.5 by using RT DUROID 5880[1]. In further study of optimization of dual band microstrip antenna [2] ithasbeen found that the return loss for dual bandFrequencyat2.4GHz is -43dB and at 3GHz is -27dB and acceptable VSWR. To get compact size and maintain performance of antenna for multiple band that is dual band, triple band antenna etc., various shapes of antenna was integrated [3]. It was presented in [4], introducing slot into patch that is L-Shape, experimentally increase bandwidth up to 13%. To enhance bandwidth further various shapes like L-shape,U-shapeetc., slot was introduced andbandwidth upto42%wasincreased [5,6]. In [7] and [8] the author’s proposed bandwidth enhancement techniques that is by using photonic band gap structure and wideband stacked microstrip antennas respectively. By introducing stacked microstrip antenna band width and gain was enhanced. While Designing of symmetrical microstrip antenna, it has been found that microstripantenna hasnarrowBandwidth [9],Asymmetrical position of patch antenna on ground affect the performance of antenna that is to enhance bandwidth it was also found that asymmetrical position of slot on patch affects performance of antenna[10] thatis asymmetrical L-shape,U- shape position of slot on patch affects the performance. In [10] designed asymmetrical slot of L-shaped on patch antenna for UWB application with acceptable return loss that is -10dB and peak gain 2.2 to 6.1 dBi for operating bandwidth 3.01-11.30 GHz frequencies. In this paper we simulated and presented our design by using HFSS.13 simulator. In this paper a line feedpatchwiththreerectangle slot microstrip antenna with two antisymmetrical notch (Figure 1) is designed and simulated for thefrequencyrange of 1-6 GHz. This antenna presents an extension to Miniaturization of Differentially-Driven Microstrip Planar Inverted F Antenna [14]. 2. PROPOSED DESIGN The results of proposed dual band microstrip patch antenna verified in HFSS Simulator with optimization. Initially, microstrip antenna was designed for single band further it is designed and optimized for dual band, simulation setup is shown in Figure 1. Actual patch shape of size 25mm X 25mm is shown in figure 2, it consists of two rectangular notch of size 0.2mmx12.5mm, using this two slot on patch side of antenna we designed single band antenna with acceptable performance parameter. We further introduced central rectangular notch of size 13.4x1.0mm to optimize and operate antenna for dual band. [7]. The resulting antenna structure has the following parameters; the patch shape length Wp = 12.5 mm, and its width Lp =12.5 mm. The size of the ground plane has been found to be of Lg1 = 12.5 mm and Wg1 = 12.5mm. The height of substrate is h= 0.8 mm and dielectric constant εr = 4.4. A co-axial fed at 10x10mm distance from corner of patch. The length andwidthofcenter slot is 1.0mm x 13.4mm. Initially, we will conduct a simulation study on the structure of Figure 1 by adjusting the dimension of slot that is position of fed line to patch. Initially we put ground position forentire patch. As we reduce ground material, it is found that return loss is getting reduced from -10dB to -18dB. The ground substrate length on backside of patch is reduced and simulated for different dimension; it is observed that we get two band (2.28-2.35GHz)and(4.05-4.11GHz)withsufficient return loss, the resulting return loss responses obtained by reducing ground plane, we obtain optimized return loss as presented in figure 3. Further we simulated togetthirdband, we introduced two rectangular slot (Ls as shown in figure 3) on patch, we simulated fordifferentdimensionofrectangular slot on patch to get optimum result,dimensionofrectangular changes from 0.8x12.5mm to 1.2x12.5mm and return loss is
  • 2.
    International Research Journalof Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 07 Issue: 04 | Apr 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2020, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.34 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1309 presented in figure 3. Further we changed the dimension of central slot from 0.1x13.4 mm to 0.8x13.4 mm (Ls in figure 4), return loss is presented in figure 4. Figure 1. Proposed antenna simulation setup Figure 2: Proposed antenna design (Ground) 3. RESULT ANALYSIS In this section parametric study is conductedtooptimizethe proposed antenna. The key design parameters used for the optimization are number of slot on patch, dimension of ground plane (length and width) and fed position. The detailed analysis of these parameters is investigated in the following paragraphs of this section. From figure 3 and figure 4, it is observed that, we get minimum return lossthat is -25dB, and -22 dB at 2.3GHz and 4.07GHz respectively. We enhanced this designed dual mocrostri antenna for multiband application that is we analyzed for third band, by adjusting position of fed line, feed line position by 0.1 mm from 9.5x10.5 to 10x10.5mm performance is presented in figure 5.It is observed that antenna is good candidate to operate for tri band frequency response. Fig 3: Return loss of antenna for variation in slot Results of the variation of the size of the ground plane, as Figure 3 implies that the dual band response increases for slot dimension reduction by introducing slot into it. However, dual-band responses are obtained with increased or decreased higher resonating bands. The effect of the width of ground has been demonstrated in Figure 3, and Figure 4. Also figure 5 implies that there is clear impact of feed line position on multiband response of antenna. Fig 4: Return loss of antenna for variation in ground plane For larger values of the width of ground, the antenna offers a one-band resonant behavior, and the dual-band resonance occurs as the width is made smaller and approaches that of the reference antenna. Fig 5: Return loss of antenna for variation fed position Fig 6: E-Field and H-Field Radiation pattern at 2.3GHz (Red: θ=0o, Blue: Φ=90o)
  • 3.
    International Research Journalof Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 07 Issue: 04 | Apr 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2020, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.34 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1310 Fig. 7 E-Field and H-Field Radiation pattern at 4.05GHz (Red: θ=0o, Blue: Φ=90o) Fig. 8 E-Field and H-Field Radiation pattern at 5.85 GHz (Red: θ=0o, Blue: Φ=90o) Fig. 9 VSWR Figure (6)-(8) depicts the radiation pattern for tri band that is at 2.3GHz, 4.07GHz and 5.85GHz frequency since return loss at this frequency is -25dB, -24dB and -27dB respectively. Figure(9) represents VSWR for all band,VSWR is less than 2 for all band that is good matchingbetweenfeed line patch. Table 1 presents optimized result of microstrip antnna. Table 1. Simulation Result Frequency Return loss VSWR Efficiency 2.28-2.35 GHz -25 0.9 95% 4.05-4.11 GHz -24 1.1 94% 5.8-5.9GHz -27 1.2 95% 4. CONCLUSION The design optimization of a two slot patch antenna has been presented and discussed. It has been shown that, with correct selection of slot dimensions on patch and shape of ground plane, a dual band frequency response can be achieved. With this antenna, we get much improved performance this design is obtained method, as a candidate for use dual band that is (2.28-2.35 GHz) , (4.05-4.11 GHz) and (5.8-5.9) GHz. The antenna has been modeled and its performance has been analyzed using a HFSS simulator. The proposed antenna has been found to possess a miniaturized size and a width making it suitable for compact size narrow bandwidth tri band applications. REFERENCES [1] Ahmed H. Reja “Study of Micro Strip Feed Line PatchAntenna”, Antennas and Propagation International Symposium, vol. 27, pp. 340-342 December 2008.. [2] Sahntanu Kumar Behera and Y. Choukiker, ”Design andOptimization of Dual Band Micro Strip Antenna Using Practicle Swarm Optimization Technique,” Springer Science Business Media, LLC, pp. 1346-1354, 2010 [3] M. A. S. Alkanhal, ”Compact composite triple band antenna”, Progress In Electromagnetics Research, PIER 93, 221-236, 2009 [4] A. A. Deshmukh and G. Kumar, “Compact broadband gapcoupled shorted L-shaped microstrip antennas,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation International Symposium, vol 1, (Baltimore, Maryland), pp. 106–109, IEEE, July 2001. [5] Z. M.Chen and Y. W. M. Chial, “Broadband probe-fed Lshaped plate antenna,” Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, vol. 26, pp. 204–206, 1985. [6] K. F. Lee, K. M. Luk, K. F. Tong, Y. L. Yung, and T.Huynh, “Experimental study of the rectangular patch with a U- shaped slot,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation International Symposium, vol.1, (Baltimore, Maryland), pp. 10–13, IEEE, July 1996. [7] S. C. Gao, L. W. Li, M. S. Leong, and T. S. Yeo, “Designand analysis of a novel wideband microstrip antenna,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation International Symposium,vol.1, (Boston, Massachusetts), pp. 90–93, IEEE, July 2001. [8] M. Khodier and C. Christodoulou, “A technique to furtherincrease the bandwidth Of stacked microstrip antennas,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation International Symposium, vol. 3, pp. 1394–1397, IEEE, July 2000. [9] Neenansha Jain, Anubhuti Khare, Rajesh Nema, “E- ShapeMicro strip Patch Antenna on Different Thickness for pervasive WirelessCommunication”,International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2011 [10] K. Song, Y.-Z. Yin, S.-T. Fan, and B. Chen,” compact open ended L-shaped slot antenna with asymmetrical rectangle patch for UWB application”, Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 19, 235-243, 2011
  • 4.
    International Research Journalof Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 07 Issue: 04 | Apr 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2020, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.34 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1311 [11]V.V.Reddy, N. V. S. N. Sarma, “Triband Circularly Polarized Koch Fractal Boundary Microstrip Antenna”, IEEE antennas and wireless propagation letters, vol. 13, 2014 [12] T.-H. Chang and J.-F. Kiang, “Compact multi-band H- shaped slot antenna,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 4345–4349, [13] K. Song, Y.-Z. Yin, S.-T. Fan, and B. Chen, “compact open- ended l-shaped slot antenna with asymmetrical rectangular patch for UWB applications”, Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 19, 235-243, 2011 [14] Zijian Shao, Yue Ping Zhang, “Miniaturization of Differentially-Driven Microstrip PlanarInvertedFAntenna”, IEEE Transactions On Antennas And Propagation, 0018- 926X (c) 2018. AUTHOR’S PROFILE Amarnath Kashinath Netke, has completed his Bachelor’s Degree from Electronics and Telecommunication Department & pursuing Masters in Digital Communication Department in MBES college of Engineering, Ambajogai, India Prof. V. V. Yerigeri, has completed B.E in Electronics & Communication Engineering & M.E. in Power Electronics & Perusing Ph.D in Signal Processing.He has teaching experience of more than24 Years. He has presented many papers in National & International Conferences & Published more than 50 papers in National & International Journals.