Presented by:
Surendra Poudel
VALIDITY
• “Validity refers to the truthfulness of findings. It
determines whether the research truly measures that
what it was intended to measure or how truthful the
research results are.”
• Validity refers to the credibility or believability of the
research. Are the findings genuine? Is hand
strength a valid measure of intelligence?
Valid measures should
satisfy three criteria
• Content Validity
• Construct Validity
• Criterion-Related Validity
1. Content Validity
Content validity concerns the extent to which a
measure adequately represents all facets of
concept.
Validity access the following:
a. Does the instrumental seem like a reasonable
way to gain the desired information?
b. Does it seems well designed?
c. Is it good “operationalization” or “translation” of
the construct?
2. Construct Validity
Construct validity is the extent to which a test
measures the concept or construct that it is intended
to measure.
Convergent and discriminate validity:
• Convergent validity refers to the degree to which
two measures of constructs that theoretically should
be related, are in fact related.
• In contrast discriminate validity tests whether
concepts or measurements that are supposed to be
unrelated are, in fact, unrelated
Three steps should follow to know whether
a piece of research has construct validity:
1. The theoretical relationship must be specified.
2. The empirical relationship between the measures of
the concept must be examined.
3. The empirical evidences must be interpret.
Criterion validity
Criterion is the extent to which a measure is related
to an outcome.
Criterion validity is often divided into concurrent and
predictive validity.
• Concurrent validity refers to a comparison between
the measure in question and an outcome assessed
at the same time.
• Predictive validity on the other hand, compares the
measure in question with an outcome assessed at
a later time.
RELIABILITY
• The extent to which results are consistent over time and an
accurate representation of the total population under study
is referred to as a reliability, and if the results of a study can
be reproduced under a similar methodology, then the
research instrument is considered to be reliable.
• Reliability means the consistency between measurements
in a series.
Methods of
Obtaining Reliability
1. Test -Related Reliability: same test is given to
the same people after a period of time
2. Alternative form Reliability: same test isnt given
instead two tests must be designed to measure
the same things.
3. Split-Half Reliability: it involves dividing the
total number of items into two groups and
computing a measures of similarity (calculating
correlation between two halves of an
instruments)
Relationship between
Reliability and Validity
Reliability and validity ppt

Reliability and validity ppt

  • 1.
  • 2.
    VALIDITY • “Validity refersto the truthfulness of findings. It determines whether the research truly measures that what it was intended to measure or how truthful the research results are.” • Validity refers to the credibility or believability of the research. Are the findings genuine? Is hand strength a valid measure of intelligence?
  • 3.
    Valid measures should satisfythree criteria • Content Validity • Construct Validity • Criterion-Related Validity
  • 4.
    1. Content Validity Contentvalidity concerns the extent to which a measure adequately represents all facets of concept. Validity access the following: a. Does the instrumental seem like a reasonable way to gain the desired information? b. Does it seems well designed? c. Is it good “operationalization” or “translation” of the construct?
  • 5.
    2. Construct Validity Constructvalidity is the extent to which a test measures the concept or construct that it is intended to measure. Convergent and discriminate validity: • Convergent validity refers to the degree to which two measures of constructs that theoretically should be related, are in fact related. • In contrast discriminate validity tests whether concepts or measurements that are supposed to be unrelated are, in fact, unrelated
  • 6.
    Three steps shouldfollow to know whether a piece of research has construct validity: 1. The theoretical relationship must be specified. 2. The empirical relationship between the measures of the concept must be examined. 3. The empirical evidences must be interpret.
  • 7.
    Criterion validity Criterion isthe extent to which a measure is related to an outcome. Criterion validity is often divided into concurrent and predictive validity. • Concurrent validity refers to a comparison between the measure in question and an outcome assessed at the same time. • Predictive validity on the other hand, compares the measure in question with an outcome assessed at a later time.
  • 8.
    RELIABILITY • The extentto which results are consistent over time and an accurate representation of the total population under study is referred to as a reliability, and if the results of a study can be reproduced under a similar methodology, then the research instrument is considered to be reliable. • Reliability means the consistency between measurements in a series.
  • 9.
    Methods of Obtaining Reliability 1.Test -Related Reliability: same test is given to the same people after a period of time 2. Alternative form Reliability: same test isnt given instead two tests must be designed to measure the same things. 3. Split-Half Reliability: it involves dividing the total number of items into two groups and computing a measures of similarity (calculating correlation between two halves of an instruments)
  • 10.