Shift Reduce Parser in
Compiler Design
Compilers rely on parsing techniques to translate high-level
programming languages into machine-readable code. The shift reduce
parsing algorithm is a widely used method for parsing context-free
grammars, playing a critical role in the compilation process.
BY ABINAYASRI.S
Introduction to Parsing
What is Parsing?
Parsing is the process of analyzing the grammatical
structure of a programming language. It involves breaking
down source code into a hierarchical representation that
can be understood by the compiler.
Role in Compilation
Parsing is a critical step in the compilation pipeline,
converting high-level code into an intermediate
representation the compiler can use to generate machine-
readable instructions.
Context-Free Grammars
Definition
Context-free grammars are a formal
system used to specify the syntax of
programming languages. They define
the rules for generating valid
sentences in a language.
Production Rules
Context-free grammars consist of a
set of production rules that map non-
terminal symbols to a sequence of
terminals and non-terminals.
Syntax Trees
Parsing a program using a context-
free grammar produces a hierarchical
syntax tree that represents the
grammatical structure of the code.
Shift Reduce Parsing Technique
How it Works
Shift-reduce parsing is a technique
that constructs the parse tree of a
program by repeatedly shifting
tokens from the input stream onto a
stack, and then reducing the stack
contents according to the grammar
rules.
Parsing Actions
The parser alternates between two
main actions: shifting a token onto
the stack, or reducing a sequence of
stack elements into a single
nonterminal based on a grammar
production.
Parsing Table
A parsing table guides the shift-
reduce process, indicating whether to
shift, reduce, or signal an error for
each combination of current state
and lookahead token.
Parsing Tables and Actions
Parsing Tables Parsing tables are used to guide the shift-reduce parsing process. They
indicate whether to shift a token onto the stack, reduce based on a grammar
rule, or signal an error for each state and lookahead token.
Shift Action The shift action moves the next input token onto the parse stack, advancing
the parser to the next state.
Reduce Action The reduce action replaces a sequence of stack symbols matching the right-
hand side of a grammar production with the corresponding left-hand side
nonterminal.
Resolve Conflicts When a parsing table contains both a shift and reduce action for the same
state and lookahead, a shift-reduce conflict occurs that must be resolved.
Resolving Shift Reduce
Conflicts
Precedence and
Associativity Rules
Define operator precedence
and associativity to
disambiguate shift-reduce
conflicts.
Speculative Parsing
Explore multiple parsing
paths in parallel to
determine the correct action.
Grammar Refactoring
Modify the grammar to
eliminate conflicts by
restructuring productions.
Conflict Resolution
Strategies
Prioritize shift over reduce or
vice versa based on the
specific use case.
Implementing a Shift Reduce Parser
1
Grammar Analysis
Analyze the context-free grammar to identify terminals,
nonterminals, and production rules.
2 Parsing Table Construction
Generate the parsing table that defines the shift, reduce,
and error actions for each state and lookahead token.
3
Stack Management
Implement the stack data structure to store the
sequence of tokens and nonterminals during parsing.
4 Shift-Reduce Logic
Execute the core shift-reduce algorithm, alternating
between shifting tokens and reducing the stack based
on the parsing table.
5
Conflict Resolution
Handle any shift-reduce or reduce-reduce conflicts that
arise, using techniques like precedence and associativity
rules.
Advantages and Limitations
Efficiency
Shift-reduce parsing is
computationally efficient,
making it well-suited for real-
time or high-volume
processing tasks.
Simplicity
The algorithm is relatively
straightforward to implement
compared to more complex
parsing techniques.
Limitation: Conflicts
Shift-reduce conflicts can
arise, requiring careful
grammar design and conflict
resolution strategies.
Limitation:
Expressiveness
Shift-reduce parsing may
struggle with highly complex
or ambiguous grammars,
limiting its expressiveness.
Conclusion and Future Directions
1
Continued Research
Ongoing efforts to enhance shift-reduce parsing through advanced conflict resolution strategies and optimizations for
modern hardware and software architectures.
2
Integrating ML
Exploring the potential of machine learning techniques to improve the adaptability and error-handling
capabilities of shift-reduce parsers.
3
Parallelization
Developing parallel and distributed shift-reduce parsing algorithms to meet the
demands of high-throughput, real-time data processing applications.
4
Targeting New Languages
Expanding the applicability of shift-reduce parsing to emerging
programming paradigms and domain-specific languages.
Operator Precedence
Parsing: Unlocking the
Power of Expression
Evaluation
Operator precedence parsing is a powerful technique that enables
efficient evaluation of complex mathematical expressions. It determines
the order in which operations are executed, ensuring accurate and
reliable results.
Fundamentals of Operator Precedence
Order of Operations
The standard order of operations, often remembered as
PEMDAS, specifies the priority in which mathematical
operations are executed. This ensures consistent and
predictable results when evaluating complex expressions.
Order of Evaluation
Operator precedence parsing determines the actual order
in which operations are evaluated, considering not just the
operation type but also associativity rules. This allows for
accurate interpretation of ambiguous expressions.
Parsing Expression Grammars (PEGs)
What are PEGs?
Parsing Expression Grammars (PEGs) are a formal way to
specify and parse programming language syntax. They
define the structure of expressions using a recursive
descent parsing approach.
PEGs and Operator Precedence
PEGs inherently capture operator precedence by specifying
the order in which expressions are recognized and parsed.
This allows for accurate interpretation of complex
mathematical and logical expressions.
Constructing the Operator Precedence Table
Identify Operators
Start by listing all the operators that can appear in the
expressions you need to parse.
Determine Precedence
Establish the relative precedence of the operators based on
the order of operations rules.
Assign Associativity
Specify whether each operator is left-associative, right-
associative, or non-associative.
Construct the Table
Organize the operator information into a 2D table to guide
the parsing process.
Top-Down Recursive Descent Parsing
1 Parse Expression
The parser recursively breaks down the input expression into smaller subexpressions,
following the rules specified in the operator precedence table.
2 Recognize Operators
As the parser encounters operators, it determines their precedence and associativity to
properly order the evaluation of the subexpressions.
3 Build Parse Tree
The parser constructs a tree-like data structure that represents the syntactic structure of the
expression, capturing the precedence and grouping of operations.
4 Evaluate Expression
Once the parse tree is built, the parser can efficiently evaluate the expression by traversing
the tree and performing the operations in the correct order.
Handling Associativity and
Precedence
Recognize Associativity
The parser must correctly identify the associativity of each
operator to determine the grouping of subexpressions during
evaluation.
Apply Precedence Rules
By referring to the operator precedence table, the parser can
correctly order the execution of operations based on their
precedence levels.
Resolve Ambiguity
Proper handling of associativity and precedence ensures the
parser can accurately interpret even the most complex and
ambiguous expressions.
Error Handling and Diagnostics
Robust Error Handling
Operator precedence parsers must be able to gracefully handle
syntax errors and unexpected inputs to provide meaningful
feedback to users.
Diagnostics and Reporting
Clear diagnostics, including line numbers and detailed error
messages, help users quickly identify and resolve issues in their
expressions.
Backtracking and Recovery
The parser should be able to backtrack and try alternative parsing
paths to recover from errors, rather than simply failing.
Informative Feedback
Providing users with helpful context about the nature of the error
and suggestions for correction improves the overall user
experience.
Practical Applications of Operator Precedence
Parsing
Mathematical
Calculations
Accurately evaluating
complex expressions in
calculator apps and
programming languages.
Compilers and
Interpreters
Parsing programming
language syntax and
translating to machine-
executable code.
Spreadsheet Formulas
Ensuring precise evaluation
of formulas with mixed
operations and parentheses.
Formula Editors
Providing intuitive interfaces
for building and evaluating
complex mathematical
expressions.
THANK YOU

Parsers: Shift reduce parsing and operator precedence parsing

  • 1.
    Shift Reduce Parserin Compiler Design Compilers rely on parsing techniques to translate high-level programming languages into machine-readable code. The shift reduce parsing algorithm is a widely used method for parsing context-free grammars, playing a critical role in the compilation process. BY ABINAYASRI.S
  • 2.
    Introduction to Parsing Whatis Parsing? Parsing is the process of analyzing the grammatical structure of a programming language. It involves breaking down source code into a hierarchical representation that can be understood by the compiler. Role in Compilation Parsing is a critical step in the compilation pipeline, converting high-level code into an intermediate representation the compiler can use to generate machine- readable instructions.
  • 3.
    Context-Free Grammars Definition Context-free grammarsare a formal system used to specify the syntax of programming languages. They define the rules for generating valid sentences in a language. Production Rules Context-free grammars consist of a set of production rules that map non- terminal symbols to a sequence of terminals and non-terminals. Syntax Trees Parsing a program using a context- free grammar produces a hierarchical syntax tree that represents the grammatical structure of the code.
  • 4.
    Shift Reduce ParsingTechnique How it Works Shift-reduce parsing is a technique that constructs the parse tree of a program by repeatedly shifting tokens from the input stream onto a stack, and then reducing the stack contents according to the grammar rules. Parsing Actions The parser alternates between two main actions: shifting a token onto the stack, or reducing a sequence of stack elements into a single nonterminal based on a grammar production. Parsing Table A parsing table guides the shift- reduce process, indicating whether to shift, reduce, or signal an error for each combination of current state and lookahead token.
  • 5.
    Parsing Tables andActions Parsing Tables Parsing tables are used to guide the shift-reduce parsing process. They indicate whether to shift a token onto the stack, reduce based on a grammar rule, or signal an error for each state and lookahead token. Shift Action The shift action moves the next input token onto the parse stack, advancing the parser to the next state. Reduce Action The reduce action replaces a sequence of stack symbols matching the right- hand side of a grammar production with the corresponding left-hand side nonterminal. Resolve Conflicts When a parsing table contains both a shift and reduce action for the same state and lookahead, a shift-reduce conflict occurs that must be resolved.
  • 6.
    Resolving Shift Reduce Conflicts Precedenceand Associativity Rules Define operator precedence and associativity to disambiguate shift-reduce conflicts. Speculative Parsing Explore multiple parsing paths in parallel to determine the correct action. Grammar Refactoring Modify the grammar to eliminate conflicts by restructuring productions. Conflict Resolution Strategies Prioritize shift over reduce or vice versa based on the specific use case.
  • 7.
    Implementing a ShiftReduce Parser 1 Grammar Analysis Analyze the context-free grammar to identify terminals, nonterminals, and production rules. 2 Parsing Table Construction Generate the parsing table that defines the shift, reduce, and error actions for each state and lookahead token. 3 Stack Management Implement the stack data structure to store the sequence of tokens and nonterminals during parsing. 4 Shift-Reduce Logic Execute the core shift-reduce algorithm, alternating between shifting tokens and reducing the stack based on the parsing table. 5 Conflict Resolution Handle any shift-reduce or reduce-reduce conflicts that arise, using techniques like precedence and associativity rules.
  • 8.
    Advantages and Limitations Efficiency Shift-reduceparsing is computationally efficient, making it well-suited for real- time or high-volume processing tasks. Simplicity The algorithm is relatively straightforward to implement compared to more complex parsing techniques. Limitation: Conflicts Shift-reduce conflicts can arise, requiring careful grammar design and conflict resolution strategies. Limitation: Expressiveness Shift-reduce parsing may struggle with highly complex or ambiguous grammars, limiting its expressiveness.
  • 9.
    Conclusion and FutureDirections 1 Continued Research Ongoing efforts to enhance shift-reduce parsing through advanced conflict resolution strategies and optimizations for modern hardware and software architectures. 2 Integrating ML Exploring the potential of machine learning techniques to improve the adaptability and error-handling capabilities of shift-reduce parsers. 3 Parallelization Developing parallel and distributed shift-reduce parsing algorithms to meet the demands of high-throughput, real-time data processing applications. 4 Targeting New Languages Expanding the applicability of shift-reduce parsing to emerging programming paradigms and domain-specific languages.
  • 10.
    Operator Precedence Parsing: Unlockingthe Power of Expression Evaluation Operator precedence parsing is a powerful technique that enables efficient evaluation of complex mathematical expressions. It determines the order in which operations are executed, ensuring accurate and reliable results.
  • 11.
    Fundamentals of OperatorPrecedence Order of Operations The standard order of operations, often remembered as PEMDAS, specifies the priority in which mathematical operations are executed. This ensures consistent and predictable results when evaluating complex expressions. Order of Evaluation Operator precedence parsing determines the actual order in which operations are evaluated, considering not just the operation type but also associativity rules. This allows for accurate interpretation of ambiguous expressions.
  • 12.
    Parsing Expression Grammars(PEGs) What are PEGs? Parsing Expression Grammars (PEGs) are a formal way to specify and parse programming language syntax. They define the structure of expressions using a recursive descent parsing approach. PEGs and Operator Precedence PEGs inherently capture operator precedence by specifying the order in which expressions are recognized and parsed. This allows for accurate interpretation of complex mathematical and logical expressions.
  • 13.
    Constructing the OperatorPrecedence Table Identify Operators Start by listing all the operators that can appear in the expressions you need to parse. Determine Precedence Establish the relative precedence of the operators based on the order of operations rules. Assign Associativity Specify whether each operator is left-associative, right- associative, or non-associative. Construct the Table Organize the operator information into a 2D table to guide the parsing process.
  • 14.
    Top-Down Recursive DescentParsing 1 Parse Expression The parser recursively breaks down the input expression into smaller subexpressions, following the rules specified in the operator precedence table. 2 Recognize Operators As the parser encounters operators, it determines their precedence and associativity to properly order the evaluation of the subexpressions. 3 Build Parse Tree The parser constructs a tree-like data structure that represents the syntactic structure of the expression, capturing the precedence and grouping of operations. 4 Evaluate Expression Once the parse tree is built, the parser can efficiently evaluate the expression by traversing the tree and performing the operations in the correct order.
  • 15.
    Handling Associativity and Precedence RecognizeAssociativity The parser must correctly identify the associativity of each operator to determine the grouping of subexpressions during evaluation. Apply Precedence Rules By referring to the operator precedence table, the parser can correctly order the execution of operations based on their precedence levels. Resolve Ambiguity Proper handling of associativity and precedence ensures the parser can accurately interpret even the most complex and ambiguous expressions.
  • 16.
    Error Handling andDiagnostics Robust Error Handling Operator precedence parsers must be able to gracefully handle syntax errors and unexpected inputs to provide meaningful feedback to users. Diagnostics and Reporting Clear diagnostics, including line numbers and detailed error messages, help users quickly identify and resolve issues in their expressions. Backtracking and Recovery The parser should be able to backtrack and try alternative parsing paths to recover from errors, rather than simply failing. Informative Feedback Providing users with helpful context about the nature of the error and suggestions for correction improves the overall user experience.
  • 17.
    Practical Applications ofOperator Precedence Parsing Mathematical Calculations Accurately evaluating complex expressions in calculator apps and programming languages. Compilers and Interpreters Parsing programming language syntax and translating to machine- executable code. Spreadsheet Formulas Ensuring precise evaluation of formulas with mixed operations and parentheses. Formula Editors Providing intuitive interfaces for building and evaluating complex mathematical expressions.
  • 18.