Tracking Training Session Effectiveness

5,800 course completions in 30 days 🥳 Amazing! But... What does that even mean? Did anyone actually learn anything? As an instructional designer, part of your role SHOULD be measuring impact. Did the learning solution you built matter? Did it help someone do their job better, quicker, with more efficiency, empathy, and enthusiasm? In this L&D world, there's endless talk about measuring success. Some say it's impossible... It's not. Enter the Impact Quadrant. With measureable data + time, you CAN track the success of your initiatives. But you've got to have a process in place to do it. Here are some ideas: 1. Quick Wins (Short-Term + Quantitative) → “Immediate Data Wins” How to track: ➡️ Course completion rates ➡️ Pre/post-test scores ➡️ Training attendance records ➡️ Immediate survey ratings (e.g., “Was this training helpful?”) 📣 Why it matters: Provides fast, measurable proof that the initiative is working. 2. Big Wins (Long-Term + Quantitative) → “Sustained Success” How to track: ➡️ Retention rates of trained employees via follow-up knowledge checks ➡️ Compliance scores over time ➡️ Reduction in errors/incidents ➡️ Job performance metrics (e.g., productivity increase, customer satisfaction) 📣 Why it matters: Demonstrates lasting impact with hard data. 3. Early Signals (Short-Term + Qualitative) → “Small Signs of Change” How to track: ➡️ Learner feedback (open-ended survey responses) ➡️ Documented manager observations ➡️ Engagement levels in discussions or forums ➡️ Behavioral changes noticed soon after training 📣 Why it matters: Captures immediate, anecdotal evidence of success. 4. Cultural Shift (Long-Term + Qualitative) → “Lasting Change” Tracking Methods: ➡️ Long-term learner sentiment surveys ➡️ Leadership feedback on workplace culture shifts ➡️ Self-reported confidence and behavior changes ➡️ Adoption of continuous learning mindset (e.g., employees seeking more training) 📣 Why it matters: Proves deep, lasting change that numbers alone can’t capture. If you’re only tracking one type of impact, you’re leaving insights—and results—on the table. The best instructional design hits all four quadrants: quick wins, sustained success, early signals, and lasting change. Which ones are you measuring? #PerformanceImprovement #InstructionalDesign #Data #Science #DataScience #LearningandDevelopment

Smile Sheets: The Illusion of Training Effectiveness. If you're investing ~$200K per employee to ramp them up, do you really want to measure training effectiveness based on whether they liked the snacks? 🤨 Traditional post-training surveys—AKA "Smile Sheets"—are great for checking if the room was the right temperature but do little to tell us if knowledge was actually transferred or if behaviors will change. Sure, logistics and experience matter, but as a leader, what I really want to know is: ✅ Did they retain the knowledge? ✅ Can they apply the skills in real-world scenarios? ✅ Will this training drive better business outcomes? That’s why I’ve changed the way I gather training feedback. Instead of a one-and-done survey, I use quantitative and qualitative assessments at multiple intervals: 📌 Before training to gauge baseline knowledge 📌 Midway through for real-time adjustments 📌 Immediately post-training for immediate insights 📌 Strategic follow-ups tied to actual product usage & skill application But the real game-changer? Hard data. I track real-world outcomes like product adoption, quota achievement, adverse events, and speed to competency. The right metrics vary by company, but one thing remains the same: Smile Sheets alone don’t cut it. So, if you’re still relying on traditional post-training surveys to measure effectiveness, it’s time to rethink your approach. How are you measuring training success in your organization? Let’s compare notes. 👇 #MedDevice #TrainingEffectiveness #Leadership #VentureCapital

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐳𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 They treat it like a one-time event. A workshop. A box ticked. An expense. The result? Underwhelming impact and wasted budgets. The truth is: training only works when it is designed like a leadership journey, not a classroom session. That’s how executive presence gets built - through repeated practice, reflection, and reinforcement. Here are 3 ways to make training stick and deliver business results: 𝟏. 𝐃𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐩𝐮𝐫𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞 Build structured journeys. Pre-work, dynamic sessions, post-work application. Like a mission, not a meeting. 𝟐. 𝐑𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐜𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧  Group Coaching, virtual peer huddles, and daily quick-hit refreshers so new skills don’t fade. 𝐌𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬 Track the business impact. Not just attendance sheets and smiley-face feedback. One of our clients discovered this the hard way. For years, they invested in sending leaders to The Ivy League MBA schools, skills workshops, communication templates, even role-play drills. Each worked in rehearsals. But in real CXO and board conversations, the impact never stuck. That’s when they shifted to our 𝐄𝐱𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 that included an 𝐄𝐱𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐥𝐮𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐀𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 and 100-day journey. The difference? Senior leaders didn’t just learn, they practiced, measured progress, and reinforced behaviours until they became second nature. Within 4 months, senior leaders reported: ✅ 𝟔𝟑% 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡-𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞  ✅ 𝟓𝟕% 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐞𝐱𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧  ✅ 𝟓𝟓% 𝐮𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐞𝐱𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 CEO noticed the shift immediately in boardroom decision-making and stakeholder engagement. When you do this, training shifts from being an expense to becoming a strategic asset that fuels collaboration, loyalty, and decision-making. That’s how organizations grow leaders with true presence. 👉 What’s one reinforcement practice you’ve seen work well in your company’s L&D programs? #ExecutivePresence #CoachVikram #Impact #Leadership

The best training programs break three sacred HR rules. While most HR teams focus on completion rates and satisfaction scores, high-ROI learning experiences deliberately ignore these metrics. They measure behavior change at 30, 60, and 90 days instead of smile sheets at day one. Here's what's actually happening: Companies are throwing billions at learning programs that never stick. The "Great Training Robbery" study proves what many suspected all along. But here's the real problem. We're designing backwards. → Measuring engagement instead of application → Tracking completion rather than competency → Celebrating attendance over actual outcomes The organisations getting results? They flip this completely. Start with the business goal. Work backwards to the behavior change needed. Then design the learning experience. Simple. Instead of "Did people enjoy the session?" they ask "Can our people perform differently now?" This shift shows up in real numbers. Companies measuring behavioural change report 25% higher performance improvements compared to traditional training metrics. For HR teams, this means stepping away from being the completion rate police. Start being the performance change architect instead. Your learning budget is too valuable for vanity metrics. What are you actually measuring in your training programs?

Ever wondered why your corporate trainings get no ROI? Let’s fix that. You’re investing time and money, but results don’t follow. Sound familiar? Here’s how corporations waste their training budget & how smart leaders reverse the trend: → Training isn’t tied to real business problems. Employees forget what’s not relevant now. → Managers aren’t involved. Without their buy-in, teams never apply what they learn. → Too much theory. Not enough actionable skills for the daily grind. → No follow-up. One-off workshops don’t change habits. → Results aren’t measured. If you don’t track impact, you can’t improve. Want quick wins? Here’s a better approach: → Link every session to pressing, measurable business goals. → Involve managers at every step. → Use real-life case studies, not generic slides. → Build mini-coaching or follow-up into every program. → Track simple before/after metrics, celebrate, tweak, repeat. Game-changing results don’t come from more training, they come from the right training delivered the right way. Are you ready to turn your training budget into actual business results? Let’s talk about building a program that works. DM me for a free strategy call.

I analyzed 7019 training sessions to identify the “sweet spot” on maximizing your training budget. 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗰𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺: Actionable.co is a training sustainment platform, specifically focused on measuring the behavior change impact of corporate learning programs. For this analysis, I pulled data from the 7019 training sessions that were run over the last 3 years, consisting of 2 – 100 participants. 𝗔𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗺𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀: A couple assumptions are baked into this analysis: 1. The purpose of training is to drive change. In the case of the data leveraged here, that’s certainly the case (consultants only use Actionable when the goal is to drive behavior change)., If your goal is NOT to drive change with your program, you can stop reading now. The results won’t be useful. 2. Self-reported behavior change has value. It’s not conclusive, and it’s not exhaustive. It is, however, the earliest impact data we can capture (before 360s/KPIs, etc.) and – in our experience – is typically highly accurate as a leading indicator. If you don’t believe self-reported data has value then, again, these results won’t be useful to you. 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀: To determine total cost for a session, I made a couple assumptions: - $5000 for the facilitator (fixed cost) - $1500 in labour costs for logistics and planning (fixed cost) - I assumed a half-day session (4 hours) x an average hourly wage of $50/participant. - Assumed a blanket “materials” cost of $50pp. - I assumed this was virtual (no travel costs, meals, per diem, etc.) To calculate impact, I looked at two factors: - The percentage of attendees who committed to changing a behavior after the session - The self-reported improvement in said behavior. - I multiplied these two elements together (% of people committing to change x realized change) to create an Aggregate Cohort “Efficacy Score" score (displayed in the graph) 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘀 (𝗶𝗻 2 𝗳𝗹𝗮𝘃𝗼𝗿𝘀):   𝗜𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 #1: 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗼 𝗠𝗮𝘅𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗰𝘁 If you want to maximize impact, focus on smaller groups. Group sizes of 2-7 participants consistently generate 33% greater impact than groups of 8-14. Now, the per-person cost on the smaller groups is > $1000. So, the nature of the change needs to be considered, obviously. But, for topics that have a greater than $1000/person impact to the business, this feels like a bit of a no brainer. Break a group of 12 in half, if you can afford it. 𝗜𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 #2: 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗼 𝗠𝗮𝘅𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝗕𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗲𝘁 If you want to stretch your budget further, focus on groups of 18-24 participants. Your cost per person goes by 50%pp (~$525pp vs >$1000pp) while your aggregate impact only decreases by ~30%. No, it’s not as impactful on a per-person basis, but it stretches your dollar further. Like most things, the decision on the optimal group size is dependent on your goals.

How do we measure beyond attendance and satisfaction? This question lands in my inbox weekly. Here's a formula that makes it simple. You're already tracking the basics—attendance, completion, satisfaction scores. But you know there's more to your impact story. The question isn't WHETHER you're making a difference. It's HOW to capture the full picture of your influence. In my many years as a measurement practitioner I've found that measurement becomes intuitive when you have the right formula. Just like calculating area (length × width) or velocity (distance/time), we can leverage many different formulas to calculate learning outcomes. It's simply a matter of finding the one that fits your needs. For those of us who are trying to figure out where to begin, measuring more than just the basics, here's my suggestion: Start by articulating your realistic influence. The immediate influence of investments in training and learning show up in people—specifically changes in their attitudes and behaviors. Not just their knowledge. Your training intake process already contains the measurement gold you're looking for. When someone requests training, the problem they're trying to solve reveals exactly what you should be measuring. The simple shift: Instead of starting with goals or learning objectives, start by clarifying: "What problem are we solving for our target audience through training?" These data points help us to craft a realistic influence statement: "Our [training topic] will help [target audience] to [solve specific problem]." What this unlocks: Clear metrics around the attitudes and behaviors that solve that problem—measured before, during, and after your program. You're not just delivering training. You're solving performance problems. And now you can prove it. I've mapped out three different intake protocols based on your stakeholder relationships, plus the exact questions that help reveal your measurement opportunities. Check it out in the latest edition of The Weekly Measure: https://lnkd.in/gDVjqVzM #learninganddevelopment #trainingstrategy #measurementstrategy

Sales training is only effective if you can prove it. But proving it isn’t always easy. You run a programme. People show up. The feedback is positive. But when someone asks: “Did it actually change anything?” … things get blurry. What are you supposed to measure? Are reps really applying what they learnt? How do you show impact without drowning in data? --- That’s exactly the challenge I kept hearing from enablement practitioners – and why I teamed up with Hyperbound to create this: 👉 A complete breakdown of the 27 most important sales training metrics, grouped into six practical layers: • Reach & participation • Engagement & completion • Knowledge acquisition & retention • Confidence & satisfaction • Application & performance impact • Operational efficiency We’ve included definitions, formulas, real-world examples, and important considerations for each metric – so you can stop guessing what to track and start showing what’s working. A few metric highlights from the list👇 📊 Drop-off point analysis – spot where learners disengage 📊 Simulated performance score – test practical skills, not just recall 📊 Behaviour adoption rate – track what’s actually changing in the field 📊 Certification attainment rate – show mastery, not just participation 📊 Time-to-ramp reduction – measure how effectively training helps new hires reach full productivity 📊 Manager coaching follow-up rate – track reinforcement beyond the "classroom" 📊 Performance uplift delta – compare baseline to post-training outcomes 📊 Return on training investment (ROTI) – prove training’s business value Whether you’re: 🔹 Refining an existing sales training programme 🔹 Designing a new one from the ground up 🔹 Trying to measure and report on training effectiveness 🔹 Auditing what’s working (and what’s not) in your current approach 🔹 Exploring how to better link training to business outcomes ...this will help you evaluate progress at every stage of the learning journey – and link training to real commercial outcomes. --- 📌 Want the high-res one-pager with all metrics + the full in-depth breakdown? Comment “sales training metrics” and I’ll send it your way. ✌️ #sales #salesenablement #salestraining  

Dear reader, how do you test the effectiveness of your trainings? The effectiveness of data protection training can be assessed by analyzing participant responses to post-training questions. These responses provide insights into awareness creation and highlight areas for improvement. For instance, if multiple participants respond with "I don’t know" to key questions, this may indicate a gap in clarity or the need for more practical, scenario-based examples tailored to their work environment. Training outcomes directly impact an organization’s overall data protection compliance framework. It is essential to track these outcomes against specific compliance metrics. For example, has the number of phishing incidents decreased following your training? Has there been an increase in employees reporting potential data breaches or privacy concerns? Here are some metrics you can use to track training efficacy. 📌Knowledge retention & understanding. Consider: - Pre- and post-training assessment scores - Percentage of participants demonstrating improved understanding -Reduction in frequency of "I don’t know" responses in follow-up evaluations etc. 📌Behavioral changes & compliance actions. Look at -👉Number of reported security incidents before vs. after training -👉Reduction in policy violations related to data protection -👉 Increase in employees flagging suspicious emails or activities 📌Operational impact on compliance framework. This could look like; -👉Decrease in phishing attack success rates -👉 Improvement in adherence to data handling procedures - 👉Faster response times to security incidents 📌Employee engagement & feedback. Gauge things like; - 👉Participation rates in training sessions - 👉Satisfaction scores from post-training surveys - 👉Qualitative feedback on clarity and relevance of content. The above metrics can help you refine your training approach, ensuring that it remains practical, engaging, and aligned with evolving data protection risks. #dataprotection #dataprivacy # compliance ... What are some of the metrics you use?