Java Interview Series - Q5 =================== Spring IOC & DI ---------------- Imagine you’re trying to manufacture a car. To assemble the car, you need various components like a steering wheel, tires, mirrors, and so on. Without any assistance, you’d have to: -> Find the suppliers for these parts. -> Gather, install, and possibly even manage them on your own. Wouldn't it be great if someone could supply these materials for you, all ready to use, so you could just focus on assembling the car? This is exactly where Spring comes in. Spring tells developers, “Focus on assembling your car (core logic), and I’ll provide the raw materials (objects) for you. Let me take care of creating, managing, and providing these dependencies.” This "giving control to Spring" for object creation and management is what we call the Inversion of Control (IoC). Essentially, the control of object creation is inverted — from you (the developer) to Spring. Dependency injection ---------------------- DI is the mechanism through which IoC is implemented in Spring. It allows Spring to "inject" dependencies into a dependent object, either via: * Constructor Injection * Setter Injection * Field Injection Without DI (Ref img - 1) ---------------------------- Tightly Coupled Code: The CarService directly creates its dependencies (Engine and Tire). If you change the dependency implementation (e.g., use ElectricEngine instead of Engine), you need to modify CarService. Difficult to Test: How would you test CarService with alternate objects (e.g., a mock Engine) without modifying the code? It becomes challenging to perform unit testing. Harder Scalability: As the number of dependencies increases, managing and initializing them becomes complex. With DI (Ref img 2 ) ------------------- Using Dependency Injection, we delegate the responsibility of creating and injecting dependencies to Spring. The changing of dependencies is abstracted away and controlled externally, making the code much more flexible and testable. Notice that CarService no longer creates its dependencies (Engine, Tire) itself. Instead, they are injected at runtime. How to configure? ------------------ You can use @Bean, @Component, other annotations. Benefits of DI -------------- Loosely Coupled Code: CarService no longer knows how Engine or Tire is instantiated. It only depends on the interface or class. You can replace specific implementations (e.g., use ElectricEngine instead of Engine) without modifying CarService. Improved Testability: You can easily inject mock objects for testing: CarService carService = new CarService(mockEngine, mockTire); Easier Maintenance: Managing the beans is centralized (e.g., via configuration or annotations). Dependencies can be changed without altering code logic. Scalability: Spring handles the creation and lifecycle of objects, even when dependencies grow. So the next time you’re “assembling your car,” let Spring handle the raw materials — You focus on assembling
Dependency Management in Software Projects
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
Dependency management in software projects refers to the process of tracking, updating, and controlling the external libraries and components that a project relies on. This practice ensures that software remains secure, maintainable, and easy to build as new updates or security fixes emerge.
- Automate updates: Set up systems that automatically check for and apply updates to your project’s dependencies, reducing manual effort and keeping your software current.
- Monitor security: Use tools that scan dependencies for vulnerabilities so you can quickly address potential risks as part of your regular workflow.
- Centralize configuration: Maintain a single source of truth for dependency settings to simplify tracking and changes across your development team.
-
-
Story time 📜 Once upon a time there was an Anthropic engineer named Ziyad Edher. Ziyad was challenged with managing the security of dependencies in an ever-expanding codebase. Anthropic relied on manual dependency reviews to ensure every open source package met their strict security standards. This didn't scale. “We were spending 15 minutes per dependency, reviewing 5 to 10 dependencies a day," Ziyad said. "As we grew, this quickly became unsustainable. Researchers need to do research. Engineers building infrastructure need to bring in new dependencies as part of their work." How Socket is helping now: “Socket came in to handle much of the manual work, giving us greater confidence with standardized checks we could rely on. This eliminated the need to build those solutions in-house.” Here’s how the process works now (oversimplified): - Devs request new packages using Anthropic’s internal tooling. - Socket evaluates packages, & returns scores from predefined thresholds. - Packages meeting the thresholds are automatically approved, while others are flagged for manual review. The results Anthropic is seeing: "People can conduct research and build more quickly while having greater confidence that they’re not making mistakes, thanks to Socket's automated checks in place." The manual review process is almost entirely eliminated, with an ~95% reduction in the need for hands-on scrutiny of dependencies. Per Jason Clinton, CISO at Anthropic - "Attackers are evolving their supply chain attacks and legacy tools aren’t catching them. Socket’s real-time threat detection helps strengthen our security posture, even from zero-day supply chain attacks."
-
Are Automated PRs Closing the Gap in Dependency Updates? The impact of automated PRs on dependency updates has been a topic of interest since I read Chris Parnin & Samim Mirhosseini's 2017 analysis. Their study revealed that major projects utilizing automated PRs experienced an 85-day lag in updating dependencies, outperforming those relying on badge notifications (113 days) and projects without prompts (114 days). Additionally, projects with automated CI checks boasted a 32% PR merge rate, surpassing the 24% rate of those without such checks. Looking ahead to 2024, one wonders about the current state of automated dependency updates in popular open-source projects. The previously observed 85-day lag appears lengthy; have tools improved since then? Is there a shift in culture towards recognizing and addressing supply chain security risks? In my recent analysis, I discovered noteworthy trends: - Dependabot's PRs are swiftly merged or closed within 24-48 hours, indicating a significant operational enhancement. - Despite progress, delays beyond the 85-day mark may still occur due to limitations on PR creation. - Automated PRs exhibit a high merge rate of 75%, with a substantial 84% success rate in updating production dependencies. - Surprisingly, Dependabot is widely embraced for updating GitHub Actions, showcasing its popularity in this domain. The evolution of automated dependency updates underscores the continuous improvement in project efficiency and security measures, paving the way for a more robust and streamlined development process. https://lnkd.in/gq9VY72z
-
Title: “Maven: Accelerating CI/CD Pipelines for Efficient Software Development” In today's fast-paced software development ecosystem, Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) has become essential for rapid and reliable software release cycles. Maven, a powerful project management and comprehension tool, has emerged as a linchpin in these processes. It simplifies the build process and enhances the CI/CD pipeline's efficiency. Understanding Maven: Maven, developed by the Apache Software Foundation, is primarily used for Java projects. Its core feature is a Project Object Model (POM) file, which describes the software project being built, its dependencies on other external modules and components, and the build order. Maven automates various aspects of the build lifecycle and manages project builds, reporting, and documentation from a central piece of information. Maven in CI/CD Pipelines: 1. Automated Builds: Maven standardizes and automates the build process, ensuring consistency and eliminating the "it works on my machine" syndrome. This is crucial for CI/CD, where automated building and testing are fundamental. 2. Dependency Management: Maven's dependency management feature automatically downloads libraries and plugins required for a project, facilitating smooth integration and deployment processes. 3. Integration with CI/CD Tools: Maven seamlessly integrates with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Bamboo, and GitLab CI. This integration triggers builds upon code commits, leading to continuous integration. 4. Quality and Reporting: Maven can also integrate with code quality and analysis tools. It can generate reports on various quality metrics, playing a vital role in maintaining high-quality code in CI/CD. 5. Customization and Plugins: Maven’s extensive plugin library allows customization of the build process, catering to various project needs. This flexibility is crucial for tailored CI/CD pipelines. Relevance in Modern Software Development: Maven's relevance in modern CI/CD pipelines is significant. By automating and standardizing aspects of the build process, Maven reduces manual errors and speeds up development and deployment. It fits well into microservices architecture and cloud-based applications, where multiple, frequent updates are common. Conclusion: Maven has become an indispensable tool in modern software development, particularly in enhancing the efficiency and reliability of CI/CD pipelines. Its ability to automate builds, manage dependencies, integrate with other CI/CD tools, and customize through plugins makes it a valuable asset for any development team aiming for rapid, consistent, and quality software releases.