Algorithmic Trading in Volatile Markets

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

  • View profile for Di (Emma) Wu

    Quantitative Strategist of Merrill Lynch Commodities| Technology Innovation: Generating Economic Results Enthusiast | Real Estate Investors

    13,155 followers

    Learning Quantitative Trading: ⚠️ Risk Management in Quant Trading: Survive First, Thrive Later “Avoiding a loss takes priority over improving gains. To make up for a 95% loss in value requires the investor to make an astounding gain of 1900%.”—Benjamin Graham Markets don’t wait. Whether it’s tariffs, Fed surprises, flash crashes, or liquidity vanishing mid-trade — your edge isn’t in prediction, it’s in protection. Here’s a practical framework used by professionals to manage: • Stop-loss • Take-profit • Position size • Leverage • …and react to black swan volatility in real-time 1. Stop-Loss: Precision Over Emotion 🔹 ATR-Based Dynamic Stops • ATR (Average True Range) measures recent volatility • Use 1.5–2× ATR to set your stop distance 🔹 Technical Price-Level Stops • Set stops just outside support/resistance, moving averages, VWAP, etc. • Aligns stop placement with where liquidity naturally pools 🔹 Behavioral Filters • Optional but powerful: pause trading when: • 3+ losing trades in a row • Reward/risk < 2:1 for the day • Overtrading (e.g. >3 trades in 15 minutes) 2. Take-Profit: Let Winners Work ✅ Fixed Reward/Risk Ratios • Every trade should have a minimum 2:1 R:R setup ✅ Trailing Stop Based on ATR • Once in profit, trail the stop at 1.2× ATR behind price ✅ Scale-Out Strategy • TP1: Take 30% at 1.5R • TP2: Take 50% at 2.5R • Let the last 20% ride with trailing stop 3. Position Size & Leverage Formula 📌 Core Formula Position Size = (Capital × Risk%) ÷ Stop Distance • Example: • Capital = $50,000 • Risk per trade = 1% → $500 • Stop = 2% below entry → Position = $500 / 2% = $25,000 exposure 📌 Leverage Guidelines • Don’t size up unless your edge is backtested • In volatile environments (Fed day, earnings, tariffs, etc.), reduce leverage automatically 📌 Portfolio Rules • Max 3 correlated positions at once • Don’t risk >6% of capital across all open trades 4. Real-Time Risk Triggers 🛑 Auto-Deleveraging Triggers • If bid-ask spread > 3× normal → reduce position size • If order book depth collapses → pause new trades • If dark pool volume spikes 5× average → tighten stops 🛑 Smart Money Alerts • Monitor for unusual flows: • Options volume 5× daily average • Block trades >10× normal • VWAP divergence without headlines 🛑 Execution Tools • Use one-click or voice-activated stop-loss exits • Disable “cancel stop” in trading apps • Pre-program trailing stop logic via API or scripts The Final Rule “We don’t trade price. We trade probability. But we survive by respecting volatility.” You can’t stop black swans — but you can build a system that absorbs the shock. A good short post to read: https://lnkd.in/eSsvis8B #QuantTrading #RiskManagement #TradingDiscipline #StopLoss #TakeProfit #PositionSizing #Leverage #Volatility #OptionsFlow #SmartMoney #Equities #Futures #BlackSwan #PortfolioProtection

  • View profile for Valentin Nemesh

    FX Trader | Market Microstructure & Applied Mathematics | Macro Fundamentals & Psychology |

    4,008 followers

    Most market participants think volatility = noise. But if you’ve studied market microstructure, you know better. Volatility is the visible footprint of invisible conflicts — between liquidity consumers and passive providers, playing out in real time. ⸻ Let’s take a concrete example: On a U.S. index futures book, we observed a sharp price spike without any change in macro headlines or news flow. What triggered it? The heatmap showed: • Sudden sweep of passive limit orders at 4602.25 • Hidden liquidity absorbed within 1ms • Followed by delayed iceberg replenishment at 4604.00 This wasn’t noise. It was microstructure-induced volatility — a large execution algorithm finished a child order segment, triggering price imbalance in the queue. ⸻ The point? Price doesn’t move randomly. It responds to order flow imbalance, latency arbitrage, and execution tactics. And you’ll never see this on a 1-minute chart. You need microsecond-synced LOB data, footprint maps, and market depth decay tracking. ⸻ If you’re building alpha models using OHLCV… You’re not just late — you’re blind. The real alpha is hidden in the temporal structure of liquidity consumption

  • View profile for Ariel Silahian

    Electronic Trading Architect | Strategic Advisor | VisualHFT Founder

    25,681 followers

    In the last 3 months, I worked with a large client to enhance their TWAP execution algorithms. Here’s what we did 👇 #TWAP algorithms are a staple for large-order execution in financial institutions. While they offer simplicity, relying on traditional TWAP strategies in today’s complex markets leaves value untapped. Here are the advanced techniques we applied to optimize TWAP performance: 🎯 1. Liquidity Heatmap Integration Challenge: Standard TWAP executes uniformly, ignoring liquidity dynamics. Solution: Real-time liquidity heatmaps dynamically adjusted execution timing. ✅ Results: Orders concentrated during liquidity peaks reduced market impact and slippage. 🎯 2. Event-Driven Adaptive TWAP Challenge: Fixed schedules miss market-altering events. Solution: Integrated news analytics to adjust execution based on volatility triggers. ✅ Results: Adjustments during events like earnings releases improved risk management and price outcomes. 🎯 3. Microstructure-Aware Execution Challenge: Limited awareness of intraday market dynamics. Solution: Exploited order flow imbalances and latency patterns to optimize timing. ✅ Results: Enhanced execution quality and reduced adverse selection risks. 🎯 4. Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) Challenge: Algorithms lacked adaptability to other market participants. Solution: Simulated multi-agent environments to dynamically adjust strategies. ✅ Results: Improved resilience and adaptability in competitive markets. 🎯 5. Advanced Randomization Challenge: Uniform patterns are predictable and exploitable. Solution: Applied non-uniform distributions for execution intervals. ✅ Results: Reduced information leakage and enhanced execution integrity. 🎯 6. Behavioral Finance-Informed Execution Challenge: Algorithms overlooked market irrationalities. Solution: Integrated sentiment analysis to predict crowd behavior. ✅ Results: Gained strategic advantage by leveraging behavioral market shifts. 🎯 7. Order Anticipation Models Challenge: Blind to external large trades. Solution: Machine learning predicted large order timing and adjusted execution. ✅ Results: Minimized price disruption and achieved cost-efficient execution. Integrating these advanced strategies, financial institutions can significantly enhance execution performance and maintain a competitive edge. 🗨️ I’d love to continue this conversation. Reach out! #financial #sellside #vwap #algoexecutions #trading

Explore categories