Project Finance Consulting

Last month, I sat down with a senior director at one of the UK’s largest institutional banks. What he told me flipped the script on everything developers think they know about money. Most are selling the same tired story: • Strong yield • Low risk • Predictable upside Then wonder why the money’s not moving. But behind closed doors - One of the UK’s most experienced banking execs told me something every developer needs to hear. He leaned in and said: “We’ve got billions sitting on the sidelines - not because we lack capital, but because we lack conviction in the deals we’re seeing.” I asked him to clarify. “We’re bored. Another 7 percent IRR? Another copy-paste resi box? There’s no soul. No story. No relevance. We’re not backing spreadsheets anymore. We’re backing vision.” That’s when it hit me: There is no capital shortage today. There’s a shortage of meaningful projects worth backing. THE SMART MONEY ISN’T CHASING YIELD. IT’S HUNTING PURPOSE. And it’s not only one institution. • Family offices are shifting to mission-led portfolios • PE funds are filtering for human impact • Institutions are rebalancing portfolios for ESG mandates Return on Investment (ROI) still matters. Of course it does. But the new benchmark? Return on Purpose (ROP). ⸻ WHAT THIS MEANS FOR YOU If you want access to top-tier capital, your project must pass the Purpose Filter: ⸻ 1. Human-Centred Design Does your asset elevate quality of life, or just house people? • Natural light, airflow, wellness-driven layouts • Health-conscious architecture • Thoughtful spatial flow Why it matters: Purpose-led assets attract stronger tenants, build loyalty, and stay full longer. Anything less is just space for rent. ⸻ 2. Regenerative Economics Is your project designed to give more than it takes? • Net-zero or energy-positive design • Low-carbon materials • Durability over disposability Why it matters: If your asset isn’t future-ready in the next 5 years - You’ll get priced out of every serious capital conversation. ⸻ 3. Longevity and Legacy Will this still be desirable in 20 years? • Timeless design, multi-generational use • Enduring materials • Cultural relevance Why it matters: Smart capital funds forever assets, not trends. If your project fades with fashion, it fails the test. ⸻ 4. Local and Economic Relevance Is your project solving a real problem in a real place? • Place-based regeneration • Contribution, not gentrification • Community identity embedded in the design Why it matters: Investors are done with tick-box ESG. If the community wouldn’t fight to keep your project, neither will the capital. ⸻ THE BOTTOM LINE If your pitch still starts with a returns table… If your asset lacks story, soul, or substance… You’re already getting filtered out. Because while most are still chasing capital… Capital is chasing purpose. And in this new real estate cycle? Projects without it won’t only underperform. They’ll never get built.

𝗗𝘂𝗯𝗮𝗶 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘀 𝗴𝗹𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝗯𝗶𝗴 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆 Institutional investment means pension funds, insurers, sovereign funds, and REITs buying entire buildings, holding long term, and relying on audited  and predictable cashflows. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗵 𝘀𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗶𝘁 𝗮𝗹𝗹: • New York 70% • London 65% • Hong Kong 60% • Singapore 55% • 𝗗𝘂𝗯𝗮𝗶 𝟮𝟱% 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗮𝗽? • Off‑plan frenzy and launches feeds the microlandlord model, purchased by thousands of individual retail investors holding between one and five units, perpetuting market fragmentation. • Asset scarcity - while investment-grade towers, such as ICD Brookfield Place, One Zabeel, and Wasl Tower are exemplary, there needs to be 20-30 similar, single-owner assets of this quality in the market • Strata titles limit block trades and index weight. 𝗦𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 • Residential REIT IPO raised AED 14.3 bn, 26× oversubscribed. • Lunate and Olayan bought 49% of ICD Brookfield Place, the largest institutional transaction in the UAE. • The 2033 plan pushes purpose‑built, income‑driven stock. • Global investors such as Brookfield, Goldman Sachs, and Apollo are buying into the potential upside opportunity in Dubai and Abu Dhabi.    Yields of 6‑8% stay compelling, yet scale, governance, and clarity will decide whether Dubai moves from an emerging market to a core institutional investment destination. Which lever would unlock larger allocations - asset scale or title structure? What do you think? 🚀 If you’re building strategy in Dubai and the UAE’s shifting real-estate landscape, 𝗹𝗲𝘁’𝘀 𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗸. I’m exploring new senior-leadership roles and keen to keep the momentum going. Connect to share how solid data can guide your next move. #DubaiRealEstate #InstitutionalCapital #UrbanEconomics  

‼️ Everyone Wants SAF. No One Wants to Pay for It ‼️ So — How Do You Finance a £500M+ Clean Fuels Project⁉️ Let’s be blunt: SAF plants are not being built because of financing. High-CAPEX projects like SAF, e-fuels, methanol or hydrogen rarely die in the lab — They die in Pre-FEED, FEED or just before FID when the money actually needs to move. So let’s simplify the landscape. If you’re building a plant, here’s what your financing journey really looks like: 1. Pre-FEED / Pre-Development Stage Goal: Prove you’re credible enough to justify deeper due diligence. ✅ Typical funding sources: • Founder equity / angel capital — painful but essential skin in the game • Innovation grants (e.g. UK AFF, EU Innovation Fund, DOE in the US) • Strategic partnerships with tech licensors or feedstock suppliers (often in-kind support rather than cash) What works best? ➡️ Grants + early offtake LOIs — your only real credibility anchor at this stage. ⸻ 2. FEED / Advanced Development Stage Goal: Turn assumptions into engineering-grade numbers. ✅ Typical funding sources: • Blended public-private grant structures (e.g. matched funding) • Corporate venture capital (CVC) — but only if you’re aligned with their supply chain needs • Convertible debt from strategic partners (airlines, fuel suppliers) What works best? ➡️ Grants + CVC + strategic equity, but only if you can prove future revenue. ⸻ 3. FID / Construction Stage – The Real Cliff Edge Goal: Secure bankable contracts so lenders stop seeing you as “experimental.” ✅ Funding instruments that actually close deals: • Project finance (with senior debt + mezzanine) — only unlocked after offtake contracts & feedstock secured • Revenue Certainty Mechanisms (e.g. UK GSP, US 45Z, EU FEETS allowances) • Export Credit Agencies (ECAs) — massively underrated, especially for equipment-heavy builds • Loan guarantees from governments (e.g. US DOE LPO model) What works best? ➡️ Long-term offtake + GSP/45Z or similar policy-backed price floor. TL;DR — Here’s the Brutal Truth Technology without bankability is just a science project. Policy gives confidence. Offtakes give leverage. Guarantees unlock capital. If you’re stuck between FEED and FID and don’t know which lever to pull first — you’re not alone. That’s exactly the gap we help close at StratX: bridging strategy, partners and financing pathways so real plants actually get built. Let’s talk!

The Hidden Power of Corporate Loan Syndication: What Every Business Leader Should Know? If a company requires ₹500 crore, instead of one bank, five banks can share the risk, each contributing ₹100 crore. Corporate loan syndication is a crucial but often overlooked strategy for financing major acquisitions, infrastructure, and expansion. What is Corporate Loan Syndication? Loan syndication allows multiple banks to share a large loan, reducing risk and offering substantial capital, thus crucial for business growth. Why Do Businesses Need Loan Syndication? As companies grow, so do their funding needs. A single-lender approach often faces: - Regulatory lending limits restricting loan size. - Higher interest rates due to concentrated risk. - Liquidity concerns limiting available capital. Syndicated loans solve these challenges by distributing the loan among multiple lenders, making them ideal for: - Mega infrastructure projects (airports, power plants, highways). - Real estate development (commercial buildings, mixed-use projects). - Corporate expansions & M&A transactions. Bilateral Loans vs. Syndicated Loans: Bilateral Loan (Single Lender Model) - One bank provides 100% of the loan—higher risk, stricter terms. - Best for smaller corporate loans or short-term financing. Syndicated Loan (Multi-Lender Model) - Multiple banks share the loan—reducing risk per lender. - Larger loan amounts with flexible repayment terms. For funding needs over ₹50 crore, syndicated lending is typically more effective. Who Are the Key Players? - Lead Arranger (Bookrunner): The financial institution structuring the deal and securing lenders. - Co-Arrangers & Lenders: Banks providing capital based on agreed terms. -Borrower (Corporation): The company seeking financing, needing strong financials. - Loan Syndication Consultant: The advisor who ensures seamless structuring, compliance, and execution. Effective syndication relies more on deal structuring than loan size to attract lenders. Why Loan Syndication Matters in Today’s Economy: As global capital markets tighten, syndicated lending gains popularity among borrowers and lenders. For businesses, it offers: -Access to larger funding pools. - Competitive interest rates due to risk-sharing. - Flexible repayment structures tailored to growth. For lenders, it enables: - Risk diversification across multiple banks. -Participation in high-value deals. -Stronger relationships with corporate borrowers. Final Thoughts: Are You Leveraging Syndicated Lending? Many businesses consider syndicated lending only under funding constraints. Considering large-scale expansion? Syndicated lending might unlock flexible financing. Has your business explored this? What challenges did you encounter with large-scale funding? Share your thoughts! #CorporateFinance #LoanSyndication #BusinessGrowth #DebtStructuring #FinancialStrategy

This is one of two go-to reports I use to explain the global climate finance landscape. I particularly like the figure on page 4 that shows the relationship between contributors and funds showing the *public* finance flows through some of the major mechanisms. Other key messages include: - The New Climate Finance Goal: At COP29, a new collective quantified goal on climate finance (NCQG) was established, succeeding the previous USD 100 billion annual target. The new goal aims for developed countries to lead in mobilizing at least USD 300 billion per year by 2035 for developing nations' climate action. The broader goal is to scale up total climate financing from all sources to at least USD 1.3 trillion annually by 2035. - Growth of Multilateral Climate Funds: The report highlights a significant planned increase in the role of multilateral climate funds. There's a call to at least triple the annual outflows from key funds like the Green Climate Fund (GCF) and the Global Environment Facility (GEF) by 2030, based on 2022 levels. - Launch of the Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage (FRLD): A major development is the establishment of the FRLD, which became an operating entity of the UNFCCC Financial Mechanism. As of January 2025, it had received USD 741 million in pledges to assist vulnerable countries in responding to the economic and non-economic impacts of climate change. - Challenges in Accessing Finance: Despite the increasing funds, the report underscores persistent challenges for developing countries in accessing climate finance. These include the high cost of capital, burdensome application processes, and co-financing requirements. The NCQG decision specifically calls for simplifying access and deploying more non-debt-inducing financial instruments. - Increasing Complexity and the Need for Coordination: The global climate finance architecture is becoming more complex, with a multitude of multilateral, bilateral, regional, and national funds and channels. ♻️ Share this informative overview with your network if you believe it can benefit others.

Countries are off track on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, with around half of the 140 Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) targets for which sufficient data is available deviating from the required path. On a “business-as-usual” pathway, where social, economic and technological trends do not shift markedly from historical patterns, the SDGs as a whole would remain out of reach even in 2050. The latest 𝐅𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐒𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐃𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐩𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐑𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 (https://lnkd.in/eykeRr8Z) reveals a critical funding gap of USD $4 trillion annually (pre-COVID $2.5 trillion, see figure 👇 ), primarily affecting developing nations. As we stand at a pivotal moment, it's clear that traditional funding methods are insufficient to meet these escalating needs, especially in the face of global challenges like climate change, inequality, and economic instability. As high as financing gap estimates are, they pale in comparison to the costs of inaction. The cumulative additional economic and social costs incurred from climate change under a business-as-usual scenario through 2050 are estimated to be almost five times larger than the climate finance needed to limit temperature increases to 1.5 degrees Celsius. Every dollar invested in risk reduction and prevention can save up to 15 dollars in post-disaster recovery efforts. 🔑 Key Insights: 🔹 Developing countries face steeper financing costs, severely hampering their sustainable development goals (SDGs). 🔹 Part of the gap is still the huge amount of (implicit) subsidies going to fossil fuels (7% of GDP 👇...this is already more than the $4 trillion that is needed) 🔹 The Role of Private Finance: Private finance emerges as a pivotal player. However, to truly make an impact, it must align more closely with sustainable development goals. It is clear that the largest part of sustainable finance is nothing else than risk mitigation (see figure 👇) 🔹 How to get better finance: ◼ Innovative Financing: Leveraging tools like green bonds and social impact investing to direct funds where they are most needed. ◼ Reforming Financial Systems: Enhancing the capacity of financial institutions to support sustainable projects through improved regulatory frameworks. ◼ Encouraging Public-Private Partnerships: These can mobilize significant resources, combining the agility of private sector innovation with the authoritative backing of public entities. As the 2025 International Conference on Financing for Development in Spain approaches, there's a collective urgency to reform our global financial systems. This is crucial not only for bridging the finance gap but also for ensuring that investments are both impactful and aligned with the global sustainable agenda.

What if green finance could scale decarbonization for SMEs? 🚀🌱 Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) contribute about 40% of business sector emissions. However, many face significant barriers in accessing the necessary tools or funds to transition to Net Zero. Today, we are proud to have partnered with HSBC in the UK to help accelerate their transition ! Taking a step back, here is an overview of various ways in which finance can help scale the energy transition 🌱🚀: 💰 Green Loans and Equity Financial institutions are now offering tailored green loans & equity investments to invest in projects like renewable energy installations and energy efficiency upgrades at favorable terms. In 2022, green loans in Europe alone totaled over $150 billion, showing a substantial increase in availability. Green equity is rapidly growing, with venture capital for green projects reaching $10 billion in 2023. 🤝 Public-Private Partnerships Public financial institutions can offer credit guarantees and direct financing, which reduce the risk for private investors. For example, the European Investment Bank (EIB) provided over €5 billion in guarantees for green projects in 2022, mobilizing an additional €20 billion in private investment. 🌍 ESG Integration In 2023, about 60% of global asset managers incorporated ESG criteria into their investment processes. This includes exclusionary screening, where investments in industries harmful to the environment are avoided. 🔧 Innovative Financial Instruments Transition Bonds help high-emission industries ("brown" sectors) transition to greener operations, unlike green bonds, which fund entirely green projects. They support incremental improvements towards sustainability in sectors such as mining, heavy industry, and utilities. In 2022, their issuance reached $20 billion. It works for SMEs too Blended Finance: This involves using public funds to attract private investment in sustainable projects. By pooling resources, private investors reduce risks, unlocking significant capital for green initiatives. In 2022, blended finance transactions mobilized over $30 billion for sustainable development projects globally. 📚 Non-Financial Support SMEs often lack the expertise and resources to navigate sustainable finance. Public and private institutions can provide essential non-financial support, including training, information on sustainable technologies, and tools for measuring and reporting environmental performance. For instance, the SME Climate Hub offers resources and training programs that have reached over 10,000 SMEs worldwide. This is also where Greenly | Certified B Corp comes in, now offering HSBC's customers in the UK a rapid way to track their emissions. Thank you for your trust Emily Bailey Pedro Anaya Natalie Blyth ! Of course, green finance still needs to grow 100X fold, so join the movement now... https://lnkd.in/eW53NhYs

Two investments. Same return. Very different risk. That’s the punchline in this chart. Private infrastructure and global equities both delivered around 10.5% annualized over the past decade. But here’s the difference: • Global equities came with a Sharpe ratio of 0.57 • Private infrastructure? A Sharpe ratio of 1.91 In plain terms, infrastructure produced nearly the same return with less than a third of the risk-adjusted drag. This isn’t theoretical. It’s structural. Infrastructure assets aren’t trading daily on emotion. They don’t respond to tweets, headlines, or quarterly earnings surprises. They generate income from long-term contracts to provide real-world services—energy, transport, water. So while public markets were whipsawed by inflation spikes, policy pivots, and geopolitical chaos, infrastructure just kept sending cash to investors. If you’re building a portfolio that’s meant to withstand shocks, this chart should be front of mind. Because matching equity-level returns is tough. Doing it with a smoother ride? That’s rare. And that’s exactly what infrastructure has done. One uncomfortable truth: most portfolios chase performance, not risk-adjusted performance. And that’s why many investors end up overweight volatility, underweight conviction. But the math doesn’t lie. Same return. Lower stress. Greater consistency. That’s the case for infrastructure—less adrenaline, more staying power. #alternatives #privateinfrastructure #assetallocation #riskadjustedreturns #portfolioresilience #nomura #investingwithconviction

𝐀𝐬𝐢𝐚 𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐚 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐠𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 $𝟐.𝟓 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐠𝐚𝐩 in achieving its Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially in clean energy, resilient infrastructure, financial inclusion, and agriculture. 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐩𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐜 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨 𝐥𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐫 𝐬𝐮𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐝𝐮𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭-𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐟𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐠𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐟𝐭𝐬. Blended Finance - which uses limited public or philanthropic capital to unlock large-scale private investment - emerges as a strategic, scalable solution. With over $4.5 trillion in private “dry powder” globally, Asia has both the urgency and the opportunity to reimagine how development is funded. 𝐁𝐮𝐭 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐢𝐧: 𝐟𝐫𝐚𝐠𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬, 𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐩𝐢𝐩𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐤 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬. 𝐁𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐛𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐜 𝐨𝐫 𝐩𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐢𝐜 𝐜𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭, 𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐬 𝐝𝐞-𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐤 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐯𝐢𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞. This includes all areas with untapped potential across India and Southeast Asia. India, with its strong institutional frameworks and policy-led financial infrastructure, is uniquely placed to harness this wave. Initiatives like 𝐅𝐀𝐒𝐓-𝐏, which aims to mobilize $5 billion toward Asia’s climate transition, are already demonstrating outcomes. In Gujarat, startups supported by GIFT City’s regulatory sandbox are creating sustainable debt products tied to climate action, while NBFCs are testing blended lending models to fund electric mobility and decentralized energy projects. In Maharashtra, early-stage funds are experimenting with micro-blended models in agriculture and dairy logistics, using carbon offset mechanisms to bring commercial value to sustainability. Delhi-based startups in fintech and insure-tech are leveraging risk guarantees to serve underbanked populations in rural belts—proof that catalytic capital can activate both inclusion and innovation. And yet, barriers persist. Project preparation remains underfunded, institutional capital is still cautious, and most deal structures are tailor-made - leading to high transaction costs and slow replicability. Blended finance will only achieve scale if ecosystems are built around standardization, local capacity building, and long-term public-private collaboration. Blended finance is not just a funding mechanism - it’s India's opportunity to align innovation with inclusion. With the right partnerships, we can turn investment gaps into gateways for sustainable growth.

🔹 Progressive Estimations in Project Management: A Continuous Journey 🔹 In the world of project management, estimations are done progressively – and it’s crucial to understand that all estimations (cost, schedule, and scope) are deeply interconnected. 🌐 As your project moves forward, these estimations are refined with more accurate data and insights, helping you stay on top of project performance. 🔸 From High-Level Estimates to Detailed Forecasts At the initial stages, while preparing the project charter, you might rely on high-level forecasts like Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) or parametric estimates, using historical data or models. 📉 These estimates give you a ballpark figure for cost, helping to set the foundation. But as the project progresses, and scope and scheduling become clearer, we transition to detailed estimates—typically using the bottom-up approach, which leads to the creation of the cost baseline. 📊 This baseline acts as the yardstick to measure project success and keep stakeholders informed on margins. 🔸 Revisiting Estimates is Key! It's not a one-and-done process. Project estimates should be revisited periodically—at the end of each phase or when major changes occur. 🔄 Why? Because things change! Assumptions that were valid initially may no longer hold true. Regularly re-estimating ensures you’re considering today’s visibility, and your stakeholders stay informed on whether the project is on track or veering off course. 🚨 If variances arise, better to know now than later! Adjustments can be made before any major impact is felt. 🔸 A Never-Ending Process Project management is about embracing uncertainty. Projects evolve, and so do your estimates. Re-estimating and re-forecasting are essential practices that carry on throughout the entire project life cycle. 🔄 Always be ready to face reality and adjust accordingly. To explore more about managing project costs and the role of progressive estimation in detail, check out the latest discussion from PMP Exam Prep Power Hour Episode 40! You can find the full recording in the events section of my LinkedIn profile. 🎥👇 #PMP #ProjectManagement #CostEstimation #ProgressiveEstimation #PMPCertification #PMI #PMPiZenBridge #ContinuousImprovement 📌 Don’t miss it – stay ahead with accurate estimates and successful projects!