Cross-Generational Communication Challenges

People from different generations have different ways of communicating based on their different collective lived experiences. 🧓🏾Boomers mentality may have stemmed from their parents who went through economic uncertainty. Their survival mode mentality led them to cope by suppressing emotions and to display strength and grit. Many older boomers did not have access to education about psychology so they did not acknowledge emotions or communicate verbally. 💼Gen X was raised in the age of materialistic accumulation and they were in the age of improving their individual states rather than focusing on those around them. They were praised for being ‘doers” and when situations were hard, they took a “can do” approach and focused on self improvement strategies. They may have a direct and efficient way of communicating compared to other generations. 👩🏻💻Millennials grew up in the age of internet knowledge. They were the first generation to be born into an age of online access to platforms. They were also the first to have access to online knowledge and resources so they search for a better life and meaning. They seek knowledge on how to heal and process the past and what to be empathic in their communication because they have access to various perspectives due to online connections. 🤳Gen Z grew up in the age of social media where they connect in a digital age as digital natives. Their interactions online are just as valuable as interactions in person. They are deliberate about their choices to value their chosen community and set rigid boundaries and advocate openly for their preferences. They get their information from listening to podcasts and from learning from influential online thought leaders. They are comfortable expressing and sharing emotions as this is how they heal. Because they rely heavily on text messages, they follow a code of conduct in written communication so they may view direct communication without the flowery added nuances in text as being curt. Data from Pew *this cannot depict the experiences of all generations* #generations #communication #workplacewellness

𝐒𝐢𝐱 𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬. 𝐎𝐧𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐜𝐞. 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐛𝐲 𝐚𝐠𝐞—𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐛𝐲 𝐩𝐮𝐫𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞. I believed leadership meant setting direction and ensuring alignment. But over time—I’ve come to see that real leadership isn’t just about strategy. It’s about 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯. That truth has never been more relevant than it is today. For the first time in modern history, 𝐬𝐢𝐱 𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐞𝐱𝐢𝐬𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐜𝐞. It’s a leadership challenge few of us were trained for. 🔹 𝐒𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐆𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 (pre-1946): Still serving on boards; shaped by duty and discipline. 🔹 𝐁𝐚𝐛𝐲 𝐁𝐨𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐬 (1946–1964): ~12% of today’s workforce; value stability, loyalty, and legacy. 🔹 𝐆𝐞𝐧 𝐗 (1965–1980): ~27%; independent, pragmatic, delivery-focused. 🔹 𝐌𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐬 (1981–1996): ~34%; purpose-driven, collaborative, growth-oriented. 🔹 𝐆𝐞𝐧 𝐙 (1997–2012): ~27%; inclusive, tech-native, values transparency. 🔹 𝐆𝐞𝐧 𝐀𝐥𝐩𝐡𝐚 (post-2012): The emerging workforce—digital-first, fast-learning, entrepreneurial. These differences show up in how we work: → Senior leaders value hierarchy; Gen Z favors flat structures. → Boomers seek recognition; Gen X wants autonomy; Millennials want meaning; Gen Z asks, “𝘞𝘩𝘺?” → Gen Alpha? They're learning, building, and questioning earlier than ever. What feels like friction is often just generational dissonance. In a recent HBR piece, put it well: “𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘤𝘢𝘯’𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘢 𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘪𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘤𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮.” That’s the shift we need as leaders: From uniformity → to personalization From authority → to empathy From legacy leadership → to 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 leadership I now ask myself not just, “Am I leading well?” but “Am I leading 𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘭𝘺?” Because when we adapt our style—not our standards—we help every generation contribute at their best. Great leadership today means adapting with intention and embracing what makes each generation thrive. 𝐏𝐮𝐫𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐀𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭: Connecting individual roles to a broader organizational mission fosters engagement across all generations. 𝐂𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐝 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: Recognize and adapt to the preferred communication styles of each generation to enhance collaboration. 𝐅𝐥𝐞𝐱𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐀𝐫𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬: Offering flexibility can address the diverse needs and expectations of a multigenerational team. 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐋𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐎𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬: Promote a culture of lifelong learning to support professional development for all age groups. What shift have you made to better lead across generations? #HarveysLeadershipRhythms #ThoughtsWithHarvey #ExecutiveLeadership #TheLeadershipSignal #GenerationalLeadership #LeadershipReflections #LeadWithIntention #MultigenerationalWorkforce #LeadershipCue #Mentorship

Ageism is rampant in the job search right now. I’ve received more requests for help from older job seekers than ever before. Here’s a strategy that’s been working for them: Proactively Handle The Objection. Ageism is the result of bias, which is an awful thing. Instead of letting the hiring team sit with assumptions and unanswered questions, tackle them head on. Here’s how: 1. Make a list of all the reason why your age / experience might be viewed as a "downside" by a company. For example, the cost of hiring you vs. a younger applicant or capabilities with newer platforms and methods. 2. For each “objection,” draft an answer for how you’d handle it. Here’s an example: Objection - We’re not sure if you’re up to speed on industry technology Your Response - I recent got certified in [Technology] and I’m currently taking courses on [Platform A] and [Platform B] 3. Take each of your responses and weave them into a cohesive story. It could start with, “You might look at my background and see somebody who is [Insert Objection 1], [Insert Objection 2], and [Insert Objection 3].” Then incorporate those responses into your resume, cover letter, LinkedIn profile, networking conversations, and interviews. When you’re proactive about objections, they’re far easier to overcome.

Old teaches young – that’s how it went. Now, for the first time, generations teach each other.  For me that means staying open to different ways to get things done. And different ways of communicating Senior leaders often ask me how best to present to an audience of Millennials and GenZ. Here are 11 tips to communicate to younger audiences: 1 - Stay authentic  GenZ in particular values authenticity and can easily detect insincerity. 2 - Start with the audience   What’s their narrative landscape? 3 - Use relatable examples and stories  What resonate depends on who listens. 4 - Dress for the occasion  Stay true to yourself, but be aware that your first impression matters. 5 - Keep It short and engaging Younger audiences value brevity. 6 - Incorporate tech and multimedia  Add videos, Gifs, emojis, social media posts and interactive elements. 7 - Prioritize visual and aesthetic appeal Avoid cluttered slides and excessive text. 8 - Encourage interaction and participation Expect more explaining, more discussion, more listening. That’s a good thing. 9 - Highlight innovation and future trends Showcase how your topic is relevant to the future. 10 - Use inclusive language  Younger generations are more likely to hold you accountable if you don’t. 11 - Have a sounding board  Run your presentation by a younger colleague for feedback and a sense-check. Sure, there are differences, but we all have one thing in common: We crave and expect mutually respectful communication. ❓What am I missing?  ♻ Follow me Oliver Aust and please share to help your network.

Every workplace has them: the eye rolls when "the Boomer" suggests another meeting, the sighs when "the Gen Z kid" mentions work-life balance again, the assumptions flying faster than Slack messages. But here's what we're missing, generational diversity might be our most underutilized organizational superpower. The research tells a compelling story. According to Deloitte, age-diverse teams make better decisions 87% of the time. AARP found that companies with multigenerational workforces are 1.7x more likely to be innovation leaders in their industries. This isn't feel-good rhetoric, it's measurable impact. Consider the complementary strengths: Boomers bring institutional knowledge and relationship capital built over decades. Gen X offers skeptical pragmatism and independent problem-solving from their latchkey years. Millennials contribute digital fluency and collaborative approaches shaped by growing up online. Gen Z brings fresh perspectives on sustainability, inclusion, and mental health that organizations desperately need. Yes, the friction points are real. Older generations sometimes view remote work requests as laziness rather than efficiency. Younger workers might interpret process-heavy approaches as resistance to change rather than risk management. Communication preferences clash, formal emails versus instant messages, scheduled calls versus quick video chats. But here's the truth: every generation thinks the others "don't get it." Boomers were once the disruptors challenging traditional hierarchy. Gen X was labeled cynical and uncommitted. Millennials were "entitled" until they became middle managers. Today's Gen Z "snowflakes" are tomorrow's industry leaders. The organizations winning today understand that patience isn't weakness, it's strategy. When a 25-year-old's fresh perspective meets a 55-year-old's pattern recognition, innovation happens. When digital natives teach established professionals new tools while learning the politics of organizational change, everyone grows. Bridging these gaps requires intentional effort. Reverse mentoring programs where younger employees teach technology while learning leadership. Project teams deliberately mixed across generations. Recognition that "professionalism" looks different to different cohorts, and that's okay. The most successful cultures I've seen treat generational diversity like any other form of diversity: a competitive advantage that requires investment, understanding, and genuine curiosity about different perspectives. Because when five generations work together effectively, you get something powerful: the wisdom to know what shouldn't change, the courage to transform what must, and the perspective to tell the difference. That's not just good culture, that's unstoppable culture. 🌟 AA✨ —————————————————————————— 👋🏾 Hi, I’m Abi: Founder of The Culture Partnership. Follow + 🔔. I discuss organizational culture, inclusion, leadership, social equity & justice.

Ageism might be the elephant in the room in internal communications. Too often, older professionals are quietly sidelined—seen as “out of touch” or “too traditional” just because they’ve been around longer. Their depth of experience, institutional memory, and resilience in a crisis get overlooked in favour of chasing the latest shiny tool. At the recent Communications Leadership Summit in Brussels 🇧🇪 organised by Mike Klein, IABC Fellow, IABC EMENA and Strategic, I was part of an insightful discussion around ageism. Many felt that older people were perceived as too expensive in a profession where we are always having to justify the value we bring. But ageism works both ways. We noted that we had seen younger colleagues dismissed as “green” or “not strategic enough,” even when they bring sharp insights into digital culture, emerging channels, and fresh creative thinking that organisations badly need. We might also be prejudiced in thinking younger people are better at adapting to new technology like AI, but it was noted that AI is now taking away a lot of the work that used to be done by junior comms people meaning that younger people need to adopt a new approach to finding work. The truth is perhaps simply that our teams do best when they blend both young and old. So how do we make sure we’re not unconsciously excluding talent on either end of the spectrum? 1. Challenge your assumptions. Don’t let stereotypes drive hiring or project allocation—test whether your perception is based on evidence or bias. 2. Mix up project teams. Create deliberate intergenerational collaboration so people can share skills both ways. 3. Mentor in both directions. Reverse mentoring works: younger colleagues help with emerging tech, older colleagues offer strategic and political nous. 4. Value impact, not age. Measure people by the outcomes they deliver, not the years they’ve worked. 5. Audit your culture. Are subtle jokes, comments, or policies privileging one age group over another? Internal comms is about connecting across differences. That starts in our own teams.

Five generations are now present in the workforce, but most leaders only know how to communicate with 1 or 2 of them. Most leaders don’t realize they're missing an essential piece to holistic leadership: Optimization of all age groups. Leading a team requires the skills to manage across multi-generational differences. Here are three critical skills essential for success in this area: 💬Effective Communication Leaders must adapt their communication styles to suit different generations, who may have distinct preferences and expectations for receiving information. For instance, younger employees might prefer quick digital communications, while older employees may value more formal, in-person discussions. Understanding and leveraging these differences promotes clarity, minimizes misunderstandings, and fosters a culture of inclusion. 🔄️Adaptability and Continuous Learning Given the rapid pace of technological and cultural change, leaders must embrace continuous learning to stay relevant and effectively lead a diverse team. This includes being open to new tools and trends while valuing traditional methods where they are effective. Flexibility in processes and policies that cater to varying career stages and work-life needs will also help retain and engage a diverse workforce. 👂Empathy and Emotional Intelligence Leaders must show understanding and respect for the unique perspectives, values, and motivations that each generation brings to the workplace. Empathy helps build trust and enables leaders to manage potential generational conflicts or biases, creating a more collaborative environment. Emotional intelligence also helps understand generational stressors, allowing leaders to tailor support to help employees feel valued and supported at all stages of their careers. By mastering these skills, leaders can create a more cohesive, productive, and engaged multi-generational workforce. For three decades, my work has focused on diversifying workplaces and helping leaders develop the skills they need to create inclusive and equitable spaces. While you don't need to become an expert, it's essential to know how to nurture a culture of transparency and trust in rapidly evolving workplaces. Head to my profile for more information on how to work with me.

Worried your hiring strategy isn’t getting the results you want? Here's why: You're too focused on attracting talent Not on retaining and managing them well. Try this instead: ➡️ Tailor your communication style to each generation. ➡️ Align motivation with what drives each group. ➡️ Build a culture that thrives on collaboration between different age groups. From my coaching, years of hiring experience, and research... Here’s what different generations don't like, and what to do about it: Millennials: ➡️ Rigid corporate structures Create a flexible, team-oriented environment. Encourage open communication. ➡️ Lack of transparency Communicate goals, changes, and feedback openly. Keep Millennials informed and engaged. ➡️ No career growth Offer clear pathways for advancement, provide mentorship, training, and development opportunities. ➡️ Outdated technology Invest in modern tools. Streamline processes to maintain efficiency and engagement. Boomers: ➡️ Exclusion from decision-making Involve them in strategic discussions. Support them with tech adoption at their own pace. ➡️ Poor work-life balance Promote a flexible work environment. Respect their boundaries between work and personal life. ➡️ Feeling disregarded Create a culture where contributions from every generation are valued equally. Gen Z: ➡️ Lack of autonomy Give them responsibility. Trust them to manage their tasks while providing guidance. ➡️ Told what to do without context Explain the "why" behind decisions. Encourage independent thinking. ➡️ Hierarchies blocking collaboration Promote flat organisational structures that boost teamwork and communication. ➡️ Inefficient meetings Use digital tools for asynchronous communication. Keep meetings sharp and focused. In other words, create mixed-gen working groups, let Gen Z lead sprints, millennials bridge the gaps, and Boomers advise on strategy. No matter the industry, the lesson remains the same.

OK Boomer, Gen Z Doesn't Want Your 2000s Change Management Playbook! A leader was puzzled over why their meticulously planned technology rollout was meeting unexpected resistance from newer employees. The communication plan was comprehensive, training well-documented, and leadership aligned. The problem? Their entire change approach was designed for a workforce that no longer exists. 💼 Generation Z Has Entered the Workforce Born between 1997-2012, Gen Z now constitutes over 20% of the workforce. They're not just younger millennials – they're the first true digital natives with fundamentally different expectations for organizational change. The generational shift demands we rethink core OCM practices: ⚡ Communication: From Documents to Micro-Content Traditional Approach: Multi-page email announcements, detailed PDF attachments, formal town halls  Gen Z Expectation: 60-second explainer videos, visual infographics, authentic peer messaging When one bank shifted from traditional change communications to micro-content delivered through multiple channels, engagement rates increased by 64% among Gen Z employees. 🤝 Engagement: From Involvement to Co-Creation Traditional Approach: Change champions appointed to represent teams Gen Z Expectation: Direct participation in design, transparent feedback loops, social proof Gen Z employees are 3x more likely to disengage from changes without visible impact within 30 days. They expect their input to be implemented rapidly and visibly. 🌱 Motivators: From Compliance to Purpose Traditional Approach: Focus on organizational benefits and necessity Gen Z Expectation: Focus on personal impact, societal value, and authentic rationale A financial tech transformation that reframed messaging around customer benefit and social impact saw higher adoption rates among Gen Z than when using traditional business case messages. 🦋 Timeline: From Projects to Continuous Evolution Traditional Approach: Defined projects with clear start/end dates Gen Z Expectation: Agile, iterative changes with regular improvements Gen Z has grown up with software that updates weekly or daily. The concept of a "frozen" system post-implementation makes little sense to them. 📖 Your OCM 2.0 Playbook To evolve your change approach for the next generation: - Replace monolithic communications with multi-format micro-content - Build social proof through peer advocacy, not just leadership messaging - Connect changes to meaningful impact, not just business metrics - Implement feedback visibly and rapidly - Embrace continuous improvement over "project completion" Gen Z isn't resistant to change—they're resistant to change management that feels outdated, inauthentic, or disconnected from their digital reality. Has your organization updated its change approach for Gen Z employees? What generational differences have you observed in change receptivity? #ChangeManagement #GenZ #DigitalTransformation #FutureOfWork #OrganizationalChange

One thing I’ve noticed over the years in the development sector is this: when long-term decisions are made — whether in ministries, multilaterals, or global panels — the people at the table are usually not the ones who will be living most of the future that will see the consequences of those choices. I have deep respect for the wisdom and experience they bring. But just as we’ve worked toward representation across gender and geography, we rarely think about generational balance. Younger generations will live through the consequences of these decisions, yet they remain under-represented in the spaces where that future is being shaped. Younger generations aren’t just more fluent with technology; they’re also more adaptable to change. Their perspectives on AI, digital transformation, and the culture they live in every day are critical to building what’s next. Experience must guide us, yes — but so must the voices of those who will inherit the outcomes. If you’re a young professional eager to contribute to long-lasting impact, don’t be overwhelmed by the credentials or the seniority you see in forums or media. Reach out, make yourself heard, and demand inclusion in the right conversations. The future is yours — you deserve a voice in building it. The future is shaped best when every generation has a seat at the table. #FutureLeadership #YouthVoices #InclusiveDecisionMaking #AIForImpact #GlobalDevelopment